BACKGROUND: Sedative-hypnotic drugs impair memory, but details regarding the nature of this effect are unknown. The influences of propofol, thiopental, and dexmedetomidine on the performance of a task that isolates specific components of episodic memory function were measured. METHODS: Working (1 intervening item, 6 s) and long-term memory (10 intervening items, 33 s) were tested using auditory words in a continuous recognition task before and during drug administration. Eighty-three volunteer participants were randomly assigned to receive a constant target concentration of drug or placebo, producing sedative effects from imperceptible to unresponsiveness. Responsive participants were categorized as high or low performers, using a median split of long-term memory performance during drug administration. Recognition of words at the end of the study day was assessed. RESULTS: High performers had acquisition of material into long-term memory when drug was present at the same level as placebo. Retention of this material at 225 min was significantly less for propofol (39 +/- 23% loss of material) than for other drugs (17-23% loss; P < 0.01). Greater sedation in low performers was evident in multiple measures. Memory for words presented before drug was no different from that associated with placebo for all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of retention of material acquired into long-term memory during propofol administration, associated with minimal sedation, seems to define drug-induced amnesia. Sedation seems to impair the acquisition or encoding of material into long-term memory. Therefore, the putative targets of drug-induced amnesia by propofol are processes associated with retention of material in long-term memory.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Sedative-hypnotic drugs impair memory, but details regarding the nature of this effect are unknown. The influences of propofol, thiopental, and dexmedetomidine on the performance of a task that isolates specific components of episodic memory function were measured. METHODS: Working (1 intervening item, 6 s) and long-term memory (10 intervening items, 33 s) were tested using auditory words in a continuous recognition task before and during drug administration. Eighty-three volunteer participants were randomly assigned to receive a constant target concentration of drug or placebo, producing sedative effects from imperceptible to unresponsiveness. Responsive participants were categorized as high or low performers, using a median split of long-term memory performance during drug administration. Recognition of words at the end of the study day was assessed. RESULTS: High performers had acquisition of material into long-term memory when drug was present at the same level as placebo. Retention of this material at 225 min was significantly less for propofol (39 +/- 23% loss of material) than for other drugs (17-23% loss; P < 0.01). Greater sedation in low performers was evident in multiple measures. Memory for words presented before drug was no different from that associated with placebo for all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of retention of material acquired into long-term memory during propofol administration, associated with minimal sedation, seems to define drug-induced amnesia. Sedation seems to impair the acquisition or encoding of material into long-term memory. Therefore, the putative targets of drug-induced amnesia by propofol are processes associated with retention of material in long-term memory.
Authors: B J Pollard; A Bryan; D Bennett; E B Faragher; E N Un; M Keegan; A Wilson; M Burkill; P C Beatty; B T Stollery Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 1994-05 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: Laura E Nelson; Jun Lu; Tianzhi Guo; Clifford B Saper; Nicholas P Franks; Mervyn Maze Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Samuel R Chamberlain; Ulrich Müller; Andrew D Blackwell; Trevor W Robbins; Barbara J Sahakian Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2006-04-27 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Oluwaseun Akeju; Kara J Pavone; M Brandon Westover; Rafael Vazquez; Michael J Prerau; Priscilla G Harrell; Katharine E Hartnack; James Rhee; Aaron L Sampson; Kathleen Habeeb; Lei Gao; Gao Lei; Eric T Pierce; John L Walsh; Emery N Brown; Patrick L Purdon Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Kane O Pryor; Ruth A Reinsel; Meghana Mehta; Yuelin Li; John T Wixted; Robert A Veselis Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: K P Mason; E R Kelhoffer; R Prescilla; M Mehta; J C Root; V J Young; F Robinson; R A Veselis Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: Robert Veselis; Eric Kelhoffer; Meghana Mehta; James C Root; Fay Robinson; Keira P Mason Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2016-10-22 Impact factor: 3.492