Literature DB >> 18648230

Low-dose propofol-induced amnesia is not due to a failure of encoding: left inferior prefrontal cortex is still active.

Robert A Veselis1, Kane O Pryor, Ruth A Reinsel, Meghana Mehta, Hong Pan, Ray Johnson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Propofol may produce amnesia by affecting encoding. The hypothesis that propofol weakens encoding was tested by measuring regional cerebral blood flow during verbal encoding.
METHODS: Seventeen volunteer participants (12 men; aged 30.4 +/- 6.5 yr) had regional cerebral blood flow measured using H2O positron emission tomography during complex and simple encoding tasks (deep vs. shallow level of processing) to identify a region of interest in the left inferior prefrontal cortex (LIPFC). The effect of either propofol (n = 6, 0.9 microg/ml target concentration), placebo with a divided attention task (n = 5), or thiopental at sedative doses (n = 6, 3 microg/ml) on regional cerebral blood flow activation in the LIPFC was tested. The divided attention task was expected to decrease activation in the LIPFC.
RESULTS: Propofol did not impair encoding performance or reaction times, but impaired recognition memory of deeply encoded words 4 h later (median recognition of 35% [interquartile range, 17-54%] of words presented during propofol vs. 65% [38-91%] before drug; P < 0.05). Statistical parametric mapping analysis identified a region of interest of 6.6 cm in the LIPFC (T = 7.44, P = 0.014). Regional cerebral blood flow response to deep encoding was present in this region of interest in each group before drug (T > 4.41, P < 0.04). During drug infusion, only the propofol group continued to have borderline significant activation in this region (T = 4.00, P = 0.063).
CONCLUSIONS: If the amnesic effect of propofol were solely due to effects on encoding, activation in the LIPFC should be minimal. Because LIPFC activation was not totally eliminated by propofol, the amnesic action of propofol must be present in other brain regions and/or affect other memory processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18648230      PMCID: PMC2599915          DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31817fd8ae

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  48 in total

1.  Depth of processing effects on neural correlates of memory encoding: relationship between findings from across- and within-task comparisons.

Authors:  L J Otten; R N Henson; M D Rugg
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Task-dependency of the neural correlates of episodic encoding as measured by fMRI.

Authors:  L J Otten; M D Rugg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 3.  Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: the HAROLD model.

Authors:  Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2002-03

4.  Assembling and encoding word representations: fMRI subsequent memory effects implicate a role for phonological control.

Authors:  Dav Clark; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Age effects on the neural correlates of successful memory encoding.

Authors:  Alexa M Morcom; Catriona D Good; Richard S J Frackowiak; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Unconscious learning during surgery with propofol anaesthesia.

Authors:  C Deeprose; J Andrade; S Varma; N Edwards
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Lesions of the basolateral amygdala complex block propofol-induced amnesia for inhibitory avoidance learning in rats.

Authors:  M T Alkire; A Vazdarjanova; H Dickinson-Anson; N S White; L Cahill
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 8.  Episodic memory and common sense: how far apart?

Authors:  E Tulving
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2001-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Enhanced visual memory effect for negative versus positive emotional content is potentiated at sub-anaesthetic concentrations of thiopental.

Authors:  K O Pryor; R A Veselis; R A Reinsel; V A Feshchenko
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2004-06-25       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  A neuroanatomical construct for the amnesic effects of propofol.

Authors:  Robert A Veselis; Ruth A Reinsel; Vladimir A Feshchenko; Ann M Dnistrian
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 7.892

View more
  11 in total

1.  Effect of propofol on the medial temporal lobe emotional memory system: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in human subjects.

Authors:  K O Pryor; J C Root; M Mehta; E Stern; H Pan; R A Veselis; D A Silbersweig
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Visual P2-N2 complex and arousal at the time of encoding predict the time domain characteristics of amnesia for multiple intravenous anesthetic drugs in humans.

Authors:  Kane O Pryor; Ruth A Reinsel; Meghana Mehta; Yuelin Li; John T Wixted; Robert A Veselis
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Feasibility of measuring memory response to increasing dexmedetomidine sedation in children.

Authors:  K P Mason; E R Kelhoffer; R Prescilla; M Mehta; J C Root; V J Young; F Robinson; R A Veselis
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Thalamocortical synchronization during induction and emergence from propofol-induced unconsciousness.

Authors:  Francisco J Flores; Katharine E Hartnack; Amanda B Fath; Seong-Eun Kim; Matthew A Wilson; Emery N Brown; Patrick L Purdon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Altered local coherence in the default mode network due to sevoflurane anesthesia.

Authors:  Gopikrishna Deshpande; Chantal Kerssens; Peter Simon Sebel; Xiaoping Hu
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 6.  Hypothesis: suppression of memory protein formation underlies anesthetic-induced amnesia.

Authors:  Michael T Alkire; John F Guzowski
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Propofol sedation in children: sleep trumps amnesia.

Authors:  Robert Veselis; Eric Kelhoffer; Meghana Mehta; James C Root; Fay Robinson; Keira P Mason
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 3.492

8.  Propofol and midazolam inhibit conscious memory processes very soon after encoding: an event-related potential study of familiarity and recollection in volunteers.

Authors:  Robert A Veselis; Kane O Pryor; Ruth A Reinsel; Yuelin Li; Meghana Mehta; Ray Johnson
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 9.  What makes deeply encoded items memorable? Insights into the levels of processing framework from neuroimaging and neuromodulation.

Authors:  Giulia Galli
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  Propofol Affects Cortico-Hippocampal Interactions via β3 Subunit-Containing GABAA Receptors.

Authors:  Matthias Kreuzer; Sergejus Butovas; Paul S García; Gerhard Schneider; Cornelius Schwarz; Uwe Rudolph; Bernd Antkowiak; Berthold Drexler
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.