Literature DB >> 1403895

Alloplastic cranial implants made from computed tomographic scan-generated casts.

M C van Putten1, S Yamada.   

Abstract

The complexity of cranioplasty increases with increased defect size. It is difficult to produce a symmetric, accurate implant presurgically or at the time of surgery when the defect is greater than 50 cm2. The procedure is also more difficult to perform when the defect is located in the temporal, infratemporal, or frontal areas. A new procedure generates a three-dimensional cast of the skull through computed tomography and computer-aided design reformation. This article describes the process of model generation and the production of a preprocessed cranial implant. To date, six cranial implants have been made with this technique. The whole head models are accurate and help the neurosurgeon-prosthodontist team in the creation of a symmetric, anatomically correct restoration. It is the technique of choice for large implants or where the cranial bones are thin. It is not necessary to augment or alter the implant during surgery. The technique reduces surgical time, and postsurgical complications have been minimal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1403895     DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90294-k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  8 in total

1.  Stereolithography for posterior fossa cranioplasty.

Authors:  C Agner; M Dujovny; R Evenhouse; F T Charbel; L Sadler
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1998

2.  A technique for intraoperative creation of patient-specific titanium mesh implants.

Authors:  Ian Rp Sunderland; Glenn Edwards; James Mainprize; Oleh Antonyshyn
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 0.947

3.  Reconstruction of Cranial Defects in Armed Forces Personnel - Our Experience.

Authors:  T K Bandyopadhyay; G K Thapliyal; A K Dubey
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

4.  Cranioplasty with custom made alloplastic prosthetic implant: A case report.

Authors:  Lokendra Gupta; In Aparna; Dhanasekar Balakrishnan; Lingeshwar Deenadayalan; Puneeth Hegde; Priyanka Agarwal
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 1.337

5.  Rapid prototyping technology for cranioplasty: A case series.

Authors:  Ashish Thakur; Dushyant Chauhan; M Viswambaran; R K Yadav; Dhruv Sharma
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun

6.  Design of 3D Additively Manufactured Hybrid Structures for Cranioplasty.

Authors:  Roberto De Santis; Teresa Russo; Julietta V Rau; Ida Papallo; Massimo Martorelli; Antonio Gloria
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Accuracy Assessment of Molded, Patient-Specific Polymethylmethacrylate Craniofacial Implants Compared to Their 3D Printed Originals.

Authors:  Dave Chamo; Bilal Msallem; Neha Sharma; Soheila Aghlmandi; Christoph Kunz; Florian M Thieringer
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Modification of PMMA Cements for Cranioplasty with Bioactive Glass and Copper Doped Tricalcium Phosphate Particles.

Authors:  Teresa Russo; Roberto De Santis; Antonio Gloria; Katia Barbaro; Annalisa Altigeri; Inna V Fadeeva; Julietta V Rau
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 4.329

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.