Literature DB >> 1402311

Early postoperative contrast radiology in the assessment of colorectal anastomotic integrity.

A M Akyol1, J R McGregor, D J Galloway, W D George.   

Abstract

The predictive value and safety of early postoperative radiological assessment of colorectal anastomotic integrity is controversial. In this study, 233 patients with colorectal or left sided colonic anastomoses had water soluble contrast enemas performed in the early postoperative period (mean: day 7 postoperatively, range: days 4-14). A total of 40 radiological leaks were recorded but only 12 of these patients had clinical signs of anastomotic dehiscence. Furthermore, 11 patients who had normal contrast enemas subsequently developed a clinical anastomotic leak. There were therefore 28 (12.0%) false positive and 11 (4.7%) false negative results giving values for the specificity and sensitivity of the radiological investigation of 86.7% and 52.2% respectively. Only 3 patients (1.3%) developed a clinically apparent anastomotic complication following a contrast enema. We conclude that while radiological assessment of distal large bowel anastomoses in the early postoperative period appears to be a safe procedure, it provides little useful clinical information with regard to early postoperative morbidity. Recent work has, however, suggested that radiological anastomotic integrity may be relevant to long term outcome following surgery for colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1402311     DOI: 10.1007/bf00360354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  12 in total

1.  Suturing or stapling in gastrointestinal surgery: a prospective randomized study. West of Scotland and Highland Anastomosis Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Experience with the Russian model 249 suture gun for anastomosis of the rectum.

Authors:  J C Goligher; P W Lee; J Macfie; K C Simpkins; D J Lintott
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1979-04

3.  Comparison of stapling and hand-suture for left-sided large bowel anastomosis.

Authors:  W G Everett; P J Friend; J Forty
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Staples or sutures for low colorectal anastomoses: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  F P McGinn; P C Gartell; P C Clifford; F J Brunton
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 5.  Anastomotic recurrence in large bowel cancer.

Authors:  H C Umpleby; R C Williamson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 6.  Anastomotic recurrence of colorectal cancer--a biological phenomenon or an avoidable calamity?

Authors:  M R Keighley; C Hall
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Water-soluble contrast enema after colonic anastomosis.

Authors:  I G Haynes; M Goldman; S H Silverman; J Alexander-Williams; M R Keighley
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-03-22       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Large bowel anastomoses. II. The circular staplers.

Authors:  B P Waxman
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Anastomotic integrity after operations for large-bowel cancer: a multicentre study.

Authors:  L P Fielding; S Stewart-Brown; L Blesovsky; G Kearney
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-08-09

10.  Anastomotic leaks in colorectal cancer surgery: a risk factor for recurrence?

Authors:  A M Akyol; J R McGregor; D J Galloway; G D Murray; W D George
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  18 in total

1.  Testing for anastomotic integrity after reversal of loop ileostomy.

Authors:  M S Metcalfe; D Hemingway
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Complete endoscopic closure of gastric defects using a full-thickness tissue plicating device.

Authors:  Michael F McGee; Jeffrey M Marks; Judy Jin; Christina Williams; Amitabh Chak; Steve J Schomisch; Jamie Andrews; Shoichi Okada; Jeffrey L Ponsky
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Factors determining delay in relaparotomy for anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection.

Authors:  A Doeksen; P J Tanis; B C Vrouenraets; J J B Lanschot van; W F Tets van
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Polymerase chain reaction for Enterococcus faecalis in drain fluid: the first screening test for symptomatic colorectal anastomotic leakage. The Appeal-study: analysis of parameters predictive for evident anastomotic leakage.

Authors:  Niels Komen; Juliette Slieker; Paul Willemsen; Guido Mannaerts; Piet Pattyn; Tom Karsten; Hans de Wilt; Erwin van der Harst; Willem van Leeuwen; Christine Decaestecker; Hans Jeekel; Johan F Lange
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Prediction and diagnosis of colorectal anastomotic leakage: A systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Freek Daams; Zhouqiao Wu; Max Jef Lahaye; Johannus Jeekel; Johan Frederik Lange
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-02-27

6.  Facilitated early ileostomy closure after rectal cancer surgery: a case-matched study.

Authors:  S Memon; A G Heriot; C E Atkin; A C Lynch
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Controlled intraoperative water testing of left-sided colorectal anastomoses: are ileostomies avoidable?

Authors:  J M Wheeler; J M Gilbert
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Little consensus in either definition or diagnosis of a lower gastro-intestinal anastomotic leak amongst colorectal surgeons.

Authors:  K Adams; S Papagrigoriadis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  Integrated approach to colorectal anastomotic leakage: Communication, infection and healing disturbances.

Authors:  Cloë L Sparreboom; Zhou-Qiao Wu; Jia-Fu Ji; Johan F Lange
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  [Leakages after surgery of the lower gastrointestinal tract].

Authors:  S Willis; M Stumpf
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.