Literature DB >> 10364966

Controlled intraoperative water testing of left-sided colorectal anastomoses: are ileostomies avoidable?

J M Wheeler1, J M Gilbert.   

Abstract

Anastomotic leakage is a major problem in colorectal surgery, and previous studies have suggested that intraoperative identification of leaks allows repair at the time of surgery. This study examined whether testing allowed a defunctioning ileostomy to be safely omitted. A series of 102 consecutive patients underwent left-sided colorectal resection, 52 males and 50 females, mean age 65.7 years (range 16-89 years). After completion of the anastomosis, its integrity was tested by running saline into the rectum, using a manometer, to a maximum distending pressure of 30 cmH2O. Any leaks were repaired and the anastomosis retested. A defunctioning ileostomy was only performed if the anastomosis could not be shown to be leak-proof on testing. Patients underwent a contrast enema on the 8th postoperative day. Twenty-one (20.6%) patients failed the initial leakage test and 3 (3%) patients failed a second test. Two of these 21 patients went on to have a clinical leak, both of which were treated conservatively. Two defunctioning ileostomies were performed at the time of surgery. Sixteen (16.2%) had a leak on radiological testing, and there was clinical evidence of a leak in 5 (4.9%) patients. There were 3 (2.9%) deaths, but none of these had a leak on radiological testing. Incomplete anastomoses were successfully corrected intraoperatively. A defunctioning ileostomy was avoided in 98% of cases. Intraoperative testing to a pressure of 30 cmH2O is helpful in anterior resection, but does not guarantee that an intact anastomosis will remain intact postoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10364966      PMCID: PMC2503207     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  14 in total

1.  Single layer anastomosis after rectosigmoid resection.

Authors:  N A Matheson; A D Irving
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Anterior resection without a defunctioning colostomy: questions of safety.

Authors:  K Mealy; P Burke; J Hyland
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Intra-operative air testing: an audit on rectal anastomosis.

Authors:  A H Davies; D C Bartolo; A E Richards; C D Johnson; N J McC Mortensen
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Anastomotic dehiscence after anterior resection of rectum and sigmoid.

Authors:  J C Goligher; N G Graham; F T De Dombal
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1970-02       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Staples or sutures for low colorectal anastomoses: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  F P McGinn; P C Gartell; P C Clifford; F J Brunton
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 6.  Large bowel anastomoses. I. The healing process and sutured anastomoses. A review.

Authors:  G A Khoury; B P Waxman
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Anastomotic integrity after operations for large-bowel cancer: a multicentre study.

Authors:  L P Fielding; S Stewart-Brown; L Blesovsky; G Kearney
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-08-09

8.  The water soluble contrast enema after rectal anastomosis.

Authors:  A J Shorthouse; C I Bartram; A A Eyers; J P Thomson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Intraoperative air testing of colorectal anastomoses: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  J D Beard; M L Nicholson; R D Sayers; D Lloyd; N W Everson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer.

Authors:  E Rullier; C Laurent; J L Garrelon; P Michel; J Saric; M Parneix
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  18 in total

1.  The management of leaking rectal anastomoses by minimally invasive techniques.

Authors:  M Pera; S Delgado; J C García-Valdecasas; M Pera; A Castells; J M Piqué; E Bombuy; A M Lacy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Endoscopic intraoperative anastomotic testing may avoid early gastrointestinal anastomotic complications. A prospective study.

Authors:  Eva Lieto; Michele Orditura; Paolo Castellano; Margherita Pinto; Anna Zamboli; Ferdinando De Vita; Carlo Pignatelli; Gennaro Galizia
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Postsurgical infections are reduced with specialized nutrition support.

Authors:  Dan L Waitzberg; Hideaki Saito; Lindsay D Plank; Glyn G Jamieson; Palepu Jagannath; Tsann-Long Hwang; Juan M Mijares; David Bihari
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Effect of enteric biopsy closure orientation on enteric circumference and volume of saline needed for leak testing.

Authors:  Brad M Matz; Harry W Boothe; James C Wright; Dawn M Boothe
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.008

5.  Effects of CPAP on gastric pouch pressure after bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Toby N Weingarten; Michael L Kendrick; James M Swain; Lavonne M Liedl; Christopher P Johnson; Darrell R Schroeder; Bruce D Johnson; Juraj Sprung
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 6.  Prediction and diagnosis of colorectal anastomotic leakage: A systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Freek Daams; Zhouqiao Wu; Max Jef Lahaye; Johannus Jeekel; Johan Frederik Lange
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-02-27

7.  Routine leak testing in colorectal surgery in the Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program.

Authors:  Steve Kwon; Arden Morris; Richard Billingham; Joseph Frankhouse; Karen Horvath; Morrie Johnson; Shane McNevin; Anthony Simons; Rebecca Symons; Scott Steele; Richard Thirlby; Mark Whiteford; David R Flum
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2012-04

Review 8.  Intraoperative assessment of colorectal anastomotic integrity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Subramanian Nachiappan; Alan Askari; Andrew Currie; Robin H Kennedy; Omar Faiz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Intraoperative evaluation of colorectal anastomotic integrity: a comparison of air leak and dye leak tests.

Authors:  Y Rudnicki; I White; V Tiomkin; L Lahav; B Raguan; S Avital
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  Anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection: results of a standardized diagnostic and therapeutic approach.

Authors:  C Eckmann; P Kujath; T H K Schiedeck; H Shekarriz; H-P Bruch
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.