BACKGROUND: In aortic stenosis, the response of the left ventricle to pressure overload varies from compensated hypertrophy to overt heart failure. The determinants of left ventricular adaptation are poorly understood. METHODS AND RESULTS: Left ventricular function was compared to assess the role of sex in 34 women and 29 men 60 years or older with both hemodynamic and echocardiographic data characteristic of severe aortic stenosis and no important coronary artery disease. Despite a similar degree of left ventricular outflow obstruction in women versus men (aortic valve area 0.54 +/- 0.20 versus 0.59 +/- 0.19 cm2, NS), the left ventricle of women had a greater fractional shortening (37 +/- 12 versus 25 +/- 12%, p = 0.001), achieved a smaller end-systolic chamber size (1.82 +/- 0.64 versus 2.17 +/- 0.65 cm/m2, p = 0.04), and generated more pressure (210 +/- 35 versus 182 +/- 29 mm Hg, p = 0.001) with a greater maximum positive dP/dt (2.153 +/- 794 versus 1,595 +/- 384 mm Hg/sec, p = 0.02). The men had a lower cardiac index (2.12 +/- 0.59 versus 2.49 +/- 0.63 l/min/m2, p = 0.02), higher mean pulmonary artery pressure (35 +/- 13 versus 27 +/- 10 mm Hg, p = 0.01), and shorter ejection period (340 +/- 40 versus 370 +/- 40 msec, p = 0.02). Women and men were equally symptomatic. Supernormal left ventricular ejection performance was present in 41% of the women and only 14% of the men (p = 0.002). This subgroup of women had a small, thick-walled chamber (end-diastolic radius to thickness ratio, 1.58 +/- 0.52 versus 2.45 +/- 0.51 in control women, p = 0.01) with low end-systolic wall stress. Subnormal ejection performance was present in 64% of the men and only 18% of the women (p = 0.002). This subgroup of men had an increased chamber size and high end-systolic wall stress compared with control men. Greater left ventricular mass was present in men compared with women (211 +/- 55 versus 179 +/- 55 g/m2, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Sex is a factor in left ventricular adaptation to valvular aortic stenosis in adults 60 years or older.
BACKGROUND: In aortic stenosis, the response of the left ventricle to pressure overload varies from compensated hypertrophy to overt heart failure. The determinants of left ventricular adaptation are poorly understood. METHODS AND RESULTS: Left ventricular function was compared to assess the role of sex in 34 women and 29 men 60 years or older with both hemodynamic and echocardiographic data characteristic of severe aortic stenosis and no important coronary artery disease. Despite a similar degree of left ventricular outflow obstruction in women versus men (aortic valve area 0.54 +/- 0.20 versus 0.59 +/- 0.19 cm2, NS), the left ventricle of women had a greater fractional shortening (37 +/- 12 versus 25 +/- 12%, p = 0.001), achieved a smaller end-systolic chamber size (1.82 +/- 0.64 versus 2.17 +/- 0.65 cm/m2, p = 0.04), and generated more pressure (210 +/- 35 versus 182 +/- 29 mm Hg, p = 0.001) with a greater maximum positive dP/dt (2.153 +/- 794 versus 1,595 +/- 384 mm Hg/sec, p = 0.02). The men had a lower cardiac index (2.12 +/- 0.59 versus 2.49 +/- 0.63 l/min/m2, p = 0.02), higher mean pulmonary artery pressure (35 +/- 13 versus 27 +/- 10 mm Hg, p = 0.01), and shorter ejection period (340 +/- 40 versus 370 +/- 40 msec, p = 0.02). Women and men were equally symptomatic. Supernormal left ventricular ejection performance was present in 41% of the women and only 14% of the men (p = 0.002). This subgroup of women had a small, thick-walled chamber (end-diastolic radius to thickness ratio, 1.58 +/- 0.52 versus 2.45 +/- 0.51 in control women, p = 0.01) with low end-systolic wall stress. Subnormal ejection performance was present in 64% of the men and only 18% of the women (p = 0.002). This subgroup of men had an increased chamber size and high end-systolic wall stress compared with control men. Greater left ventricular mass was present in men compared with women (211 +/- 55 versus 179 +/- 55 g/m2, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Sex is a factor in left ventricular adaptation to valvular aortic stenosis in adults 60 years or older.
Authors: Yoginee Sritharen; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Hartzell V Schaff; Grace Casaclang-Verzosa; Jordan D Miller Journal: Physiology (Bethesda) Date: 2017-05
Authors: Juyong Brian Kim; Yukari Kobayashi; Tatiana Kuznetsova; Kegan J Moneghetti; Daniel A Brenner; Ryan O'Malley; Catherine Dao; Joseph C Wu; Michael Fischbein; D Craig Miller; Alan C Yeung; David Liang; Francois Haddad; William F Fearon Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Christina L Clarke; Gary K Grunwald; Larry A Allen; Anna E Barón; Pamela N Peterson; David W Brand; David J Magid; Frederick A Masoudi Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2013-10-15
Authors: Yukari Kobayashi; Juyong B Kim; Kegan J Moneghetti; Yuhei Kobayashi; Ran Zhang; Daniel A Brenner; Ryan O'Malley; Ingela Schnittger; Michael Fischbein; D Craig Miller; Alan C Yeung; David Liang; Francois Haddad; William F Fearon Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-05-17 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Mustafa I Ahmed; Mitja Lainscak; Marjan Mujib; Thomas E Love; Inmaculada Aban; Ileana L Piña; Wilbert S Aronow; Vera Bittner; Ali Ahmed Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2009-11-24 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: John P Konhilas; Alexander H Maass; Stephen W Luckey; Brian L Stauffer; Eric N Olson; Leslie A Leinwand Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2004-08-19 Impact factor: 4.733