Literature DB >> 1387929

Ondansetron compared with metoclopramide in the control of emesis and quality of life during repeated chemotherapy for breast cancer.

M Soukop1, B McQuade, E Hunter, A Stewart, S Kaye, J Cassidy, D Kerr, S Khanna, J Smyth, R Coleman.   

Abstract

This was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study which included female breast cancer patients, receiving their first of 6 scheduled courses of chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide greater than or equal to 500 mg/m2). Patients received an intravenous dose of 16 mg dexamethasone with either 8 mg ondansetron or 60 mg metoclopramide before chemotherapy, followed by oral dosing with 8 mg ondansetron or 20 mg metoclopramide 3 times daily for 5 days. A total of 93 patients were treated with ondansetron and 94 patients with metoclopramide. On day 1 of their first course of treatment 91 and 60% of patients in the ondansetron and metoclopramide groups respectively were free of emesis (p less than 0.001). Over the 5-day treatment period, the corresponding figures were 81 and 48% (p less than 0.001). The results for nausea also revealed highly statistically significant treatment differences (p less than 0.001) in favour of ondansetron for both day 1 and day 1-5 analyses of the first treatment course. Over the series of courses, 67% of patients receiving ondansetron completed all 6 courses with a maximum of 2 emetic episodes on their worst day, compared with 28% of patients receiving metoclopramide (p less than 0.001). A similar analysis for nausea revealed that 49% of patients receiving ondansetron completed all 6 courses with 'none' or 'mild' nausea compared with 27% of patients receiving metoclopramide (p less than 0.001). These differences were reflected in quality of life data (Rotterdam Symptom Checklist). After the first course of treatment, a statistically significant improvement (p = 0.002) in the psychological subscale scores was observed after ondansetron compared with metoclopramide. No differences were observed in the physical or functional activity subscales after the first course. However, the quality of life results over the series of courses revealed a more pronounced difference in favour of ondansetron in the psychological subscale scores (p less than 0.001) as well as trends in favour of ondansetron in the physical (p = 0.096) and functional activity (p = 0.056) subscales. Extrapyramidal symptoms were reported in 19% of patients in the metoclopramide group and resulted in 15% of patients withdrawing from their randomised anti-emetic schedule, either during or between treatment courses. Other adverse events were generally minor in nature and did not necessitate withdrawal from treatment. In conclusion, this study shows that ondansetron is significantly superior to metoclopramide (each with a single pre-treatment dose of dexamethasone) in the control of emesis over 6 courses of chemotherapy for breast cancer.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1387929     DOI: 10.1159/000227060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology        ISSN: 0030-2414            Impact factor:   2.935


  20 in total

Review 1.  Measuring the effect of cancer on health-related quality of life.

Authors:  D Osoba
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Ondansetron: a pharmacoeconomic and quality-of-life evaluation of its antiemetic activity in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  G L Plosker; R J Milne
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Ondansetron: costs and resource utilisation in a US teaching hospital setting.

Authors:  N E Johnson; D B Nash; C E Carpenter; C J Sistek
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Safety and efficacy of aprepitant, ramosetron, and dexamethasone for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with ovarian cancer treated with paclitaxel/carboplatin.

Authors:  Chel Hun Choi; Min Kyu Kim; Jin-Young Park; Aera Yoon; Ha-Jeong Kim; Yoo-Young Lee; Tae-Joong Kim; Jeong-Won Lee; Byoung-Gie Kim; Duk-Soo Bae
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Is ondansetron cost effective?

Authors:  J Bonneterre
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Sequential addition of aprepitant in patients receiving carboplatin-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Seiichiro Suzuki; Masato Karayama; Naoki Inui; Shigeki Kuroishi; Tomoyuki Fujisawa; Noriyuki Enomoto; Yutaro Nakamura; Koshi Yokomura; Mikio Toyoshima; Shiro Imokawa; Kazuhiro Asada; Masafumi Masuda; Takashi Yamada; Hiroshi Watanabe; Hiroshi Hayakawa; Takafumi Suda
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 7.  Acute emesis: moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jørn Herrstedt; Jim M Koeller; Fausto Roila; Paul J Hesketh; David Warr; Cynthia Rittenberg; Mario Dicato
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 8.  Consensus proposals for the prevention of acute and delayed vomiting and nausea following high-emetic-risk chemotherapy.

Authors:  Mark G Kris; Paul J Hesketh; Jorn Herrstedt; Cynthia Rittenberg; Lawrence H Einhorn; Steven Grunberg; Jim Koeller; Ian Olver; Sussanne Borjeson; Enzo Ballatori
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  A phase II, randomized study of aprepitant in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapies in colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Kuniaki Aridome; Shin-Ichirou Mori; Kenji Baba; Masayuki Yanagi; Masahiro Hamanoue; Futoshi Miyazono; Kouki Tokuda; Hiroshi Imamura; Yoshito Ogura; Kouichi Kaneko; Fumio Kijima; Kousei Maemura; Sumiya Ishigami; Shoji Natsugoe
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-31

Review 10.  [Management of chemotherapy-induced emesis: what is the standard after 20 years of clinical research].

Authors:  A Du Bois
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1998-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.