Literature DB >> 1385609

Subjective memorability and the mirror effect.

J T Wixted1.   

Abstract

The mirror effect refers to the common finding that hit and false alarm rates on a recognition test are inversely related. The present research investigated the generality of the mirror effect (to rare words) and tested whether the effect might be grounded in accurate estimates of word memorability. The first 2 experiments showed that although high- and low-frequency words exhibit a mirror effect, rare words do not. Furthermore, contrary to expectations, Ss consistently (and mistakenly) predicted that memorability was directly correlated with frequency of usage. These findings weight against the idea that the mirror effect arises because of a S's ability to reject low-frequency lures on the grounds that such words would have been remembered had they appeared previously. Instead, the rejection of lures from different frequency categories may be determined by their semantic or phonemic overlap with list targets, and an analysis along these lines may help to explain why rare words constitute an exception to the otherwise ubiquitous mirror effect.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1385609     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.18.4.681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  22 in total

1.  Accounts of the confidence-accuracy relation in recognition memory.

Authors:  T A Busey; J Tunnicliff; G R Loftus; E F Loftus
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-03

2.  The face typicality-recognizability relationship: encoding or retrieval locus?

Authors:  K A Deffenbacher; J Johanson; T Vetter; A J O'Toole
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-10

3.  Shades of the mirror effect: recognition of faces with and without sunglasses.

Authors:  W E Hockley; D H Hemsworth; A Consoli
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-01

4.  Interrupting recognition memory: tests of a criterion-change account of the revelation effect.

Authors:  W E Hockley; M W Niewiadomski
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-12

5.  A reexamination of stimulus-frequency effects in recognition: two mirrors for low- and high-frequency pseudowords.

Authors:  Lynn M Reder; Paige Angstadt; Melanie Cary; Michael A Erickson; Michael S Ayers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Traps in the route to models of memory and decision.

Authors:  W K Estes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-03

7.  Feature frequency effects in recognition memory.

Authors:  Kenneth J Malmberg; Mark Steyvers; Joseph D Stephens; Richard M Shiffrin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-06

8.  Predicting and postdicting the effects of word frequency on memory.

Authors:  Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-03

9.  The word frequency effect for recognition memory and the elevated-attention hypothesis.

Authors:  Kenneth J Malmberg; Thomas O Nelson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-01

10.  Intention to learn influences the word frequency effect in recall but not in recognition memory.

Authors:  Stephen A Dewhurst; Karen R Brandt; Melanie S Sharp
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.