Literature DB >> 1381626

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to prevent dose-limiting neutropenia in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a randomized controlled trial.

R Pettengell1, H Gurney, J A Radford, D P Deakin, R James, P M Wilkinson, K Kane, J Bentley, D Crowther.   

Abstract

The effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on neutropenia, infection, and cytotoxic chemotherapy administration was studied in a randomized trial in patients receiving intensive weekly chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Eighty patients (aged 16 to 71 years) with high-grade NHL (Kiel) of any stage were randomized to receive VAPEC-B chemotherapy alone (39 patients) or with G-CSF administered as a daily subcutaneous dose of 230 micrograms/m2 (41 patients). Prophylactic ketoconazole and cotrimoxazole were administered to all patients throughout treatment. The protocol specified identical dose modification and antibiotic treatment criteria bor both groups. Neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] less than 1.0 x 10(9)/L) occurred in 15 of 41 (37%) of the G-CSF-treated patients and in 33 of 39 (85%) of the controls, giving a relative risk for control patients of 2.31 (95% confidence interval [CI], [1.51, 3.54]; P = .00001). Fever (greater than or equal to 37.5 degrees C) with neutropenia (ANC less than 1.0 x 10(9)/L) occurred in 9 of 41 (22%) of the G-CSF group and in 17 of 39 (44%) of the controls (relative risk for control, 2.26; 95% CI [1.01, 5.06]; P = .04). There were fewer treatment delays, with shorter duration (P = .01) in patients receiving G-CSF. Chemotherapy doses were reduced in 4 of 41 (10%) of the G-CSF patients and 13 of 39 (33%) of the controls (P = .01). The dose intensity of cytotoxic chemotherapy was significantly increased in patients receiving G-CSF (median of 95% in G-CSF group compared with 83% in control patients). Three vascular deaths occurred in the G-CSF group. Delays in the control group most commonly resulted from neutropenia (19 patients, compared with 2 patients in the G-CSF-treated group, P = .000007). Severe mucositis was the major dose-limiting toxicity in G-CSF-treated patients, but did not occur more frequently than in controls (15 patients in each group). Overall, patients randomized to receive G-CSF achieved a greater dose intensity than control patients, but this did not result in significant differences in drug toxicity (other than neutropenia), intravenous antibiotic usage, or hospitalization between the two groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1381626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  69 in total

1.  Impact of ASCO guidelines for the use of hematopoietic colony stimulating factors (CSFs): survey results of fifteen Paris university hospitals.

Authors:  I Debrix; I Madelaine; N Grenet; D Roux; C Bardin; F Le Mercier; J E Fontan; O Connor; A Pointereau; P Tilleul
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1999-12

Review 2.  The role of myelopoietic growth factors in managing cancer in the elderly.

Authors:  Lodovico Balducci; Ignazio Carreca
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Colony-stimulating factors for the management of neutropenia in cancer patients.

Authors:  David C Dale
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with chemotherapy in combination with filgrastim.

Authors:  Jeff Schriber
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Drug-induced myelosuppression : diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Peter J Carey
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Re: personalized medicine and cancer supportive care: appropriate use of colony-stimulating factor support of chemotherapy.

Authors:  Arnold L Potosky; Jennifer L Malin; Benjamin Kim; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Pharmacoeconomic aspects in the treatment of curable and incurable cancer.

Authors:  V Jønsson; S R Clausen; M M Hansen
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Attitudes of physicians toward assessing risk and using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as primary prophylaxis in patients receiving chemotherapy associated with an intermediate risk of febrile neutropenia.

Authors:  Gilles Freyer; Ewa Kalinka-Warzocha; Konstantinos Syrigos; Mihai Marinca; Giuseppe Tonini; Say Liang Ng; Zee Wan Wong; Antonio Salar; Guenther Steger; Mahmoud Abdelsalam; Lucy DeCosta; Zsolt Szabo
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 9.  Neutrophil biology and the next generation of myeloid growth factors.

Authors:  David C Dale
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 11.908

10.  Impact of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  A Amadio; R Burkes; T Bailie; M McLean; B Coleman
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.