Literature DB >> 26315712

Attitudes of physicians toward assessing risk and using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as primary prophylaxis in patients receiving chemotherapy associated with an intermediate risk of febrile neutropenia.

Gilles Freyer1, Ewa Kalinka-Warzocha, Konstantinos Syrigos, Mihai Marinca, Giuseppe Tonini, Say Liang Ng, Zee Wan Wong, Antonio Salar, Guenther Steger, Mahmoud Abdelsalam, Lucy DeCosta, Zsolt Szabo.   

Abstract

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a potentially fatal complication of chemotherapy. This prospective, observational study describes physicians' approaches toward assessing FN risk in patients receiving chemotherapy regimens with an intermediate (10-20 %) FN risk. In the baseline investigator assessment, physicians selected factors considered important when assessing overall FN risk and deciding on granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) primary prophylaxis (PP). Physicians then completed patient assessments using the same lists of factors. The final FN risk scores and whether G-CSF PP was planned were reported. The final analysis included 165 physicians and 944 patients. The most frequently considered factor in both assessments was chemotherapy agents in the backbone (88 % of investigator and 93 % of patient assessments). History of FN (83 %), baseline laboratory values (76 %) and age (73 %) were commonly selected at baseline, whereas tumor type (72 %), guidelines (62 %) and tumor stage (43 %) were selected most during patient assessments. Median investigator-reported FN risk threshold for G-CSF PP was 20 % (range 10-85 %). G-CSF PP was planned in 82 % of patients with an FN risk at or above this threshold; therefore, almost one-fifth of qualifying patients would not receive G-CSF PP. Physicians generally follow guidelines, but also consider individual patient characteristics when assessing FN risk and deciding on G-CSF PP. A standardized FN risk assessment may optimize the use of G-CSF PP, which may minimize the incidence of FN in patients undergoing chemotherapy with an intermediate FN risk. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01813721.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26315712     DOI: 10.1007/s12032-015-0682-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  30 in total

1.  Hematopoietic growth factors: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the applications.

Authors:  J Crawford; C Caserta; F Roila
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Benefit of a high-dose epirubicin regimen in adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer patients with poor prognostic factors: 5-year follow-up results of French Adjuvant Study Group 05 randomized trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Infections in patients with febrile neutropenia: epidemiology, microbiology, and risk stratification.

Authors:  Claudio Viscoli; Oliviero Varnier; Marco Machetti
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Real-world experience with adjuvant fec-d chemotherapy in four Ontario regional cancer centres.

Authors:  Y Madarnas; S F Dent; S F Husain; A Robinson; S Alkhayyat; W M Hopman; J L Verreault; T Vandenberg
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Mortality, morbidity, and cost associated with febrile neutropenia in adult cancer patients.

Authors:  Nicole M Kuderer; David C Dale; Jeffrey Crawford; Leon E Cosler; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Epidemiology, management and economic impact of febrile neutropenia in oncology patients receiving routine care at a regional UK cancer centre.

Authors:  S Schelenz; D Giles; S Abdallah
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 7.  Febrile neutropenia and related complications in breast cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis versus current practice neutropaenia management: results from an integrated analysis.

Authors:  G von Minckwitz; M Schwenkglenks; T Skacel; G H Lyman; A Lopez Pousa; P Bacon; V Easton; M S Aapro
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2008-12-26       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 8.  Impact of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on febrile neutropenia and mortality in adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicole M Kuderer; David C Dale; Jeffrey Crawford; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  The impact of the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on chemotherapy dose intensity and cancer survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  G H Lyman; D C Dale; E Culakova; M S Poniewierski; D A Wolff; N M Kuderer; M Huang; J Crawford
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 10.  Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia prophylaxis following chemotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Katy L Cooper; Jason Madan; Sophie Whyte; Matt D Stevenson; Ron L Akehurst
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Impact of Baseline Risk Factors on the Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy with Pegfilgrastim Prophylaxis: A Real-World Data Analysis.

Authors:  Edward Li; Bridgette Kanz Schroader; David Campbell; Kim Campbell; Weijia Wang
Journal:  J Health Econ Outcomes Res       Date:  2021-06-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.