Literature DB >> 1371004

The effect of magnetic resonance imagers on implanted neurostimulators.

C A Gleason1, N F Kaula, H Hricak, R A Schmidt, E A Tanagho.   

Abstract

This in-vitro study was designed to investigate the safety of various implanted neurostimulators in magnetic resonance (MR) imagers. The effects of the static and changing magnetic fields and the radio frequency (RF) electromagnetic field generated by 0.35 and 1.5 T MR imagers on the voltage output of four models of implantable passive neurostimulators and two models of implantable self-powered neurostimulators was studied. The neurostimulators were mounted on a support and placed in the imagers. An oscilloscope monitored the voltages at the outputs of the neurostimulators. For an Avery single-channel stimulator, located at the isocenter, the amplitude of the output pulses induced by the 0.35 T imager was 6V; from a 1.5 T imager, it was 12 V. These amplitudes can cause discomfort and possible harm to a patient if the typical therapeutic value is 1-5 V. The amplitude of the stimulator receiver's output decreased to relatively safe values beyond 40 cm from the isocenter. By contrast, there was no significant voltage output from the Medtronic SE-4 receiver. For two models of self-powered neurostimulators, the Medtronic Itrel and the Cordis MK II, the programmed stimulus parameters were not affected by the pulsed magnetic fields of the MR imagers. However, the RF fields at the isocenter heated the metal case of the stimulators. The rotational and linear forces produced by the fixed magnet on the Cordis MK II were judged to be too strong for a patient with this implant to be scanned. The study showed that patients with certain types of implanted neurostimulators can be scanned safely under certain conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1371004     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1992.tb02904.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  10 in total

1.  MR imaging-related heating of deep brain stimulation electrodes: in vitro study.

Authors:  Daniel A Finelli; Ali R Rezai; Paul M Ruggieri; Jean A Tkach; John A Nyenhuis; Greg Hrdlicka; Ashwini Sharan; Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez; Paul H Stypulkowski; Frank G Shellock
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Radiofrequency-induced heating near fixed orthodontic appliances in high field MRI systems at 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Marc Regier; Jörn Kemper; Michael G Kaul; Markus Feddersen; Gerhard Adam; Bärbel Kahl-Nieke; Arndt Klocke
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 3.  MRI-related heating near deep brain stimulation electrodes: more data are needed.

Authors:  Akshay A Gupte; Devashish Shrivastava; Maggie A Spaniol; Aviva Abosch
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 1.875

4.  Multi-disease Deep Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Mahboubeh Parastarfeizabadi; Roy V Sillitoe; Abbas Z Kouzani
Journal:  IEEE Access       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 3.367

Review 5.  Improving Safety of MRI in Patients with Deep Brain Stimulation Devices.

Authors:  Alexandre Boutet; Clement T Chow; Keshav Narang; Gavin J B Elias; Clemens Neudorfer; Jürgen Germann; Manish Ranjan; Aaron Loh; Alastair J Martin; Walter Kucharczyk; Christopher J Steele; Ileana Hancu; Ali R Rezai; Andres M Lozano
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Alteration of GABAergic neurotransmission by pulsed infrared laser stimulation.

Authors:  Hua-Jun Feng; Chris Kao; Martin J Gallagher; E Duco Jansen; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen; Peter E Konrad; Robert L Macdonald
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Three-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Patients With Deep Brain Stimulators: Results From a Phantom Study and a Pilot Study in Patients.

Authors:  Benjamin Davidson; Fred Tam; Benson Yang; Ying Meng; Clement Hamani; Simon J Graham; Nir Lipsman
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Temperature measurement on neurological pulse generators during MR scans.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kainz; Georg Neubauer; Richard Uberbacher; François Alesch; Dulciana Dias Chan
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2002-09-12       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  The Safety of Using Body-Transmit MRI in Patients with Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Devices.

Authors:  Joshua Kahan; Anastasia Papadaki; Mark White; Laura Mancini; Tarek Yousry; Ludvic Zrinzo; Patricia Limousin; Marwan Hariz; Tom Foltynie; John Thornton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Advances in closed-loop deep brain stimulation devices.

Authors:  Mahboubeh Parastarfeizabadi; Abbas Z Kouzani
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 4.262

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.