Literature DB >> 29795873

Can Reliability of Multiple Component Measuring Instruments Depend on Response Option Presentation Mode?

Natalja Menold1, Tenko Raykov2.   

Abstract

This article examines the possible dependency of composite reliability on presentation format of the elements of a multi-item measuring instrument. Using empirical data and a recent method for interval estimation of group differences in reliability, we demonstrate that the reliability of an instrument need not be the same when polarity of the response options for its individual components differs across administrations of the instrument. Implications for empirical educational, behavioral, and social research are discussed.

Keywords:  composite reliability; confidence interval; group difference; multicomponent measuring instrument; rating scale polarity; response option

Year:  2015        PMID: 29795873      PMCID: PMC5965558          DOI: 10.1177/0013164415593602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0013-1644            Impact factor:   2.821


  3 in total

1.  Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences.

Authors:  C C Preston; A M Colman
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2000-03

2.  Rating scales, discriminability, and information transmission.

Authors:  W R GARNER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1960-11       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Reliability of multi-category rating scales.

Authors:  Richard I Parker; Kimberly J Vannest; John L Davis
Journal:  J Sch Psychol       Date:  2013-01-13
  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  On the Relationship Between Item Stem Formulation and Criterion Validity of Multiple-Component Measuring Instruments.

Authors:  Natalja Menold; Tenko Raykov
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 2.821

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.