Literature DB >> 1349755

Behavioural tests of the dopamine depletion hypothesis of neuroleptic-induced response decrement.

P Willner1, G Phillips, R Muscat, P Hood.   

Abstract

This study was carried out to test the hypothesis that neuroleptic-induced within-session response decrements reflect a fatigue process, resulting from dopamine depletion, that is present before the session begins but is masked briefly by activational cues present at the start of the session. Response decrementing effects of pimozide were examined in rats lever pressing on random interval schedules of food reinforcement. An initial experiment was carried out to rule out a pharmacokinetic explanation of the response decrement. In a second experiment, the response decrement was not exacerbated by an immediately preceding period of intense forced motor activity (wheel running). Experiments 3 and 4 tested two further predictions: that the pimozide-induced response decrement should be overcome by removing the animal to its home cage and then replacing it in the apparatus (thereby reinstating the activational cues present at the start of the session); and that response impairments should be present from the outset if the animal is confined in the apparatus prior to the start of the session (thereby allowing activational cues to dissipate). Neither prediction was confirmed. Overall, the results provide no support for the dopamine depletion hypothesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1349755     DOI: 10.1007/bf02244828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  17 in total

1.  A matching law analysis of the effects of dopamine receptor antagonists.

Authors:  P Willner; D Sampson; G Phillips; R Muscat
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Pimozide-induced extinction of intracranial self-stimulation: response patterns rule out motor or performance deficits.

Authors:  G Fouriezos; R A Wise
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1976-02-20       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Differential modulation of dopamine D2 receptors by chronic haloperidol, nitrendipine, and pimozide.

Authors:  L H Tecott; L L Kwong; S Uhr; S J Peroutka
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 13.382

4.  Tests of functional equivalence between pimozide pretreatment, extinction and free feeding.

Authors:  P Willner; K Chawla; D Sampson; S Sophokleous; R Muscat
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Dissociable effects of d-amphetamine, chlordiazepoxide and alpha-flupenthixol on choice and rate measures of reinforcement in the rat.

Authors:  J L Evenden; T W Robbins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Does pimozide block the reinforcing effect of brain stimulation?

Authors:  C R Gallistel; M Boytim; Y Gomita; L Klebanoff
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 3.533

7.  Pimozide-induced extinction in rats: stimulus control of responding rules out motor deficit.

Authors:  K B Franklin; S N McCoy
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 3.533

8.  Effects of extinction, pimozide, SCH 23390, and metoclopramide on food-rewarded operant responding of rats.

Authors:  R J Beninger; M Cheng; B L Hahn; D C Hoffman; E J Mazurski; M A Morency; P Ramm; R J Stewart
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  A comparison of the effects of pimozide and nonreinforcement on discriminated operant responding in rats.

Authors:  R J Beninger
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 10.  Brain dopamine and reward.

Authors:  R A Wise; P P Rompre
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 24.137

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.