Literature DB >> 1342924

Phylogenetic inference based on matrix representation of trees.

M A Ragan1.   

Abstract

Rooted phylogenetic trees can be represented as matrices in which the rows correspond to termini, and columns correspond to internal nodes (elements of the n-tree). Parsimony analysis of such a matrix will fully recover the topology of the original tree. The maximum size of the represented matrix depends only on the number of termini in the tree; for a tree derived from molecular sequences, the represented matrix may be orders of magnitude smaller than the original data matrix. Representations of multiple trees (which may or may not have identical termini) can readily be combined into a single matrix; columns of discrete-character-state data can be added and, if desired, weighted differentially. Parsimony analysis of the resulting composite matrix yields a hybrid supertree which typically provides greater resolution than conventional consensus trees. Use of this method is illustrated with examples involving multiple tRNA genes in organelles and multiple protein-coding genes in eukaryotes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1342924     DOI: 10.1016/1055-7903(92)90035-f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol        ISSN: 1055-7903            Impact factor:   4.286


  98 in total

1.  A supertree of early tetrapods.

Authors:  Marcello Ruta; Jonathan E Jeffery; Michael I Coates
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  A phylogenomic approach to bacterial phylogeny: evidence of a core of genes sharing a common history.

Authors:  Vincent Daubin; Manolo Gouy; Guy Perrière
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Properties of consensus methods for inferring species trees from gene trees.

Authors:  James H Degnan; Michael DeGiorgio; David Bryant; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 15.683

4.  Highways of gene sharing in prokaryotes.

Authors:  Robert G Beiko; Timothy J Harlow; Mark A Ragan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  On the ancestral compatibility of two phylogenetic trees with nested taxa.

Authors:  Mercè Llabrés; Jairo Rocha; Francesc Rosselló; Gabriel Valiente
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 2.259

6.  Phylogenetic analyses of cyanobacterial genomes: quantification of horizontal gene transfer events.

Authors:  Olga Zhaxybayeva; J Peter Gogarten; Robert L Charlebois; W Ford Doolittle; R Thane Papke
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Split-based computation of majority-rule supertrees.

Authors:  Anne Kupczok
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Dealing with incongruence in phylogenomic analyses.

Authors:  Nicolas Galtier; Vincent Daubin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Fast and consistent estimation of species trees using supermatrix rooted triples.

Authors:  Michael DeGiorgio; James H Degnan
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  BCD Beam Search: considering suboptimal partial solutions in Bad Clade Deletion supertrees.

Authors:  Markus Fleischauer; Sebastian Böcker
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.