Literature DB >> 1831594

Genetic discrimination: the use of genetically based diagnostic and prognostic tests by employers and insurers.

L Gostin.   

Abstract

Genetic discrimination is detrimental to public health programs, as well as to society generally. Advances in genetic testing and screening, accelerated and prompted by the Human Genome Initiative, increase society's ability to detect and monitor chromosomal differences. These technologies and their resulting genomic data will enhance medical science, but may also encourage discrimination. Although few employers or insurers currently utilize genetic screening, testing or data, rising employee benefit costs and market forces create powerful incentives for usage. Current municipal, state and federal laws, including the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), may not sufficiently protect employees and insureds from genetic discrimination. While municipal and state protections should not be overlooked, the ADA's sweeping scope may currently provide the most comprehensive safeguard. Federal laws banning discrimination on the basis of race or sex might also successfully redress some forms of genetic discrimination. Genetic technologies' advent necessitates efforts to rectify state and federal statutory coverage gaps, strictly regulate employers and produce comprehensive guidelines regarding its use.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Americans with Disabilities Act 1990; Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Health Care and Public Health; Legal Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1831594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Law Med        ISSN: 0098-8588


  18 in total

1.  Individual, family, and societal dimensions of genetic discrimination: a case study analysis.

Authors:  Lisa N Geller; Joseph S Alper; Paul R Billings; Carol I Barash; Jonathan Beckwith; Marvin R Natowicz
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Chevron v Echazabal: public health issues raised by the "threat-to-self" defense to adverse employment actions.

Authors:  Mark Barnes; Kimberlee A Cleaveland; Patrik S Florencio
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Genetic discrimination and the law.

Authors:  M R Natowicz; J K Alper; J S Alper
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 4.  State legislative efforts to regulate use and potential misuse of genetic information.

Authors:  J E McEwen; P R Reilly
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Comment: genetics and public health.

Authors:  G S Omenn
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  PCR-based screening for cystic fibrosis carrier mutations in an ethnically diverse pregnant population.

Authors:  W W Grody; C Dunkel-Schetter; Z H Tatsugawa; M A Fox; C Y Fang; R M Cantor; J M Novak; H N Bass; B F Crandall
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Genetic discrimination and the public entities and public accommodations Titles of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Authors:  J S Alper; M R Natowicz
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Genetic conditions and the scope of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Authors:  M R Natowicz; J K Alper; J S Alper
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  The Human Genome Project and eugenic concerns.

Authors:  K L Garver; B Garver
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Perception, experience, and response to genetic discrimination in Huntington's disease: the Australian results of The International RESPOND-HD study.

Authors:  Anita M Y Goh; Edmond Chiu; Olga Yastrubetskaya; Cheryl Erwin; Janet K Williams; Andrew R Juhl; Jane S Paulsen
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2013-01-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.