| Literature DB >> 2289955 |
C R Daniels, M Paul, R Rosofsky.
Abstract
Potential exposure to occupational reproductive hazards raises complex questions regarding health and gender discrimination in the workplace. On the one hand, growing scientific evidence suggests that workplace exposures to either sex can cause a wide range of disorders ranging from infertility to adverse pregnancy outcomes. On the other hand, policies alleging to protect workers from reproductive risks have often reinforced gender inequalities in the workplace. This article sheds new light on this continuing debate through an examination of the policy insights suggested by a recent study of reproductive hazard policies in Massachusetts. In what ways do policies evidenced in this study reflect or differ from historical patterns of protectionism? The article presents a political-legal review of reproductive hazard policies in the workplace, then examines the policy implications of the Massachusetts study, and finally presents the prescriptions for change that are implied by both the historical and contemporary evidence.Entities:
Keywords: Genetics and Reproduction; Health Care and Public Health; Legal Approach
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1990 PMID: 2289955
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Public Health Policy ISSN: 0197-5897 Impact factor: 2.222