Literature DB >> 1334900

The distribution of transposable elements within and between chromosomes in a population of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Inferences on the nature of selection against elements.

B Charlesworth1, A Lapid, D Canada.   

Abstract

Data were collected on the distribution of nine families of transposable elements among a sample of autosomes isolated from a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster, by means of in situ hybridization of biotinylated probes to polytene chromosomes. There is no general tendency for elements to accumulate at the tips of chromosomes. Elements tend to be present in excess of random expectation in the euchromatin proximal to the centromeres of the major autosomes, and on chromosome four. There is considerable heterogeneity between different families in the extent of this excess. The overall abundance of element families is inversely related to the extent to which they accumulate proximally. The level of proximal accumulation for the major autosomes is similar to that on the fourth chromosome, but less than that for the X chromosome. There is an overall deficiency of elements in the mid-section of the X compared with the mid-sections of the major autosomes, with considerable heterogeneity between families. The magnitude of this deficiency is positively related to the extent to which elements accumulate proximally. No such deficiency is seen if the proximal regions of the X and autosomes are compared. There is a small and non-significant excess of elements in third chromosomes carrying inversions. There is some between-year heterogeneity in element abundance. The implications of these findings are discussed, and it is concluded that they generally support the hypothesis that transposable element abundance is regulated primarily by the deleterious fitness consequences of meiotic ectopic exchange between elements. If this is the case, such exchange must be very infrequent in the proximal euchromatin, and the elements detected in population surveys of this kind must be inserted into sites where they have negligible mutational effects on fitness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1334900     DOI: 10.1017/s0016672300030809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Res        ISSN: 0016-6723            Impact factor:   1.588


  42 in total

Review 1.  B-chromosome evolution.

Authors:  J P Camacho; T F Sharbel; L W Beukeboom
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-02-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Recombination rate and the distribution of transposable elements in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Authors:  Carène Rizzon; Gabriel Marais; Manolo Gouy; Christian Biémont
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 3.  What makes transposable elements move in the Drosophila genome?

Authors:  M P García Guerreiro
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  The first steps of transposable elements invasion: parasitic strategy vs. genetic drift.

Authors:  Arnaud Le Rouzic; Pierre Capy
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The fate of transposable elements in asexual populations.

Authors:  Elie S Dolgin; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Molecular spectrum of spontaneous de novo mutations in male and female germline cells of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Yutaka Watanabe; Aya Takahashi; Masanobu Itoh; Toshiyuki Takano-Shimizu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  DNA transposon dynamics in populations of Daphnia pulex with and without sex.

Authors:  Sarah Schaack; Ellen J Pritham; Abby Wolf; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The effects of recombination rate on the distribution and abundance of transposable elements.

Authors:  Elie S Dolgin; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Geographical variation in insertion site number of retrotransposon 412 in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  C Vieira; C Biémont
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  Patterns of selection against transposons inferred from the distribution of Tc1, Tc3 and Tc5 insertions in the mut-7 line of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Carène Rizzon; Edwige Martin; Gabriel Marais; Laurent Duret; Laurent Ségalat; Christian Biémont
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.