Literature DB >> 1333485

Comparison of ViraPap, Southern hybridization, and polymerase chain reaction methods for human papillomavirus identification in an epidemiological investigation of cervical cancer.

E Guerrero1, R W Daniel, F X Bosch, X Castellsagué, N Muñoz, M Gili, P Viladiu, C Navarro, M L Zubiri, N Ascunce.   

Abstract

In order to provide a reliable diagnosis for the presence and type of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in a case-control study of cervical cancer in Colombia and Spain, 926 cervical scrapes from female subjects were examined by ViraPap (VP) and Southern hybridization (SH), and 510 of these (263 cases and 247 controls) were also tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the HPV L1 consensus primers. HPV DNA prevalence was much higher in cases than in controls by each of the three tests. There was complete agreement between the results of the three tests for 64.9% of the 510 specimens; 53.5% were negative and 11.4% were positive (regardless of type) by all tests. An additional 29.0% of the specimens were positive by PCR: 19.4% by PCR alone, 6.7% by PCR and VP, and 2.9% by PCR and SH. SH and/or VP gave positive results for 6.0% of the specimens for which the PCR finding was negative: 2.7% by SH alone, 2.5% by VP alone, and 0.8% by both VP and SH. When specimens which were positive by VP alone or only by SH at low-stringency conditions were excluded, PCR confirmed all but four specimens which were positive by other tests. The concordance between type-specific diagnosis by SH and PCR was 86% when HPVs were typed in both tests. HPV-16 accounted for over 80% of the typed HPVs in each test. The presence of blood in case specimens did not appear to inhibit HPV positivity by VP or by PCR at the dilution tested. Low amounts of cellular DNA of specimens resulted in some underestimation of HPV positivity by VP and SH but not by PCR. Compared with that of PCR, the sensitivities for case specimens were 38% by SH and 50% by VP; the sensitivity for control specimens, although it could not be measured precisely because there were few positive specimens, appeared to be lower than for case specimens. It was concluded that PCR-based tests are best suited for epidemiological investigation of HPVs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1333485      PMCID: PMC270559          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.30.11.2951-2959.1992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  19 in total

1.  The sexually transmitted disease model for cervical cancer: incoherent epidemiologic findings and the role of misclassification of human papillomavirus infection.

Authors:  E L Franco
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Avoiding false positives with PCR.

Authors:  S Kwok; R Higuchi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-05-18       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Epidemiology of genital human papillomavirus infection.

Authors:  L A Koutsky; D A Galloway; K K Holmes
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.222

4.  Uric acid as an inhibitor of cyclophosphamide-induced micronuclei in mice.

Authors:  A M al-Bekairi; S Qureshi; M A Chaudhry; A H Shah
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Comparative analysis of human papillomavirus detection by polymerase chain reaction and Virapap/Viratype kits.

Authors:  G C Burmer; J D Parker; J Bates; K East; B G Kulander
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Inter-laboratory variation as an explanation for varying prevalence estimates of human papillomavirus infection.

Authors:  J Brandsma; R D Burk; W D Lancaster; H Pfister; M H Schiffman
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1989-02-15       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  General primer-mediated polymerase chain reaction permits the detection of sequenced and still unsequenced human papillomavirus genotypes in cervical scrapes and carcinomas.

Authors:  A J van den Brule; P J Snijders; R L Gordijn; O P Bleker; C J Meijer; J M Walboomers
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1990-04-15       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Analysis of the physical state of different human papillomavirus DNAs in intraepithelial and invasive cervical neoplasm.

Authors:  A P Cullen; R Reid; M Campion; A T Lörincz
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 9.  Human papillomaviruses in the pathogenesis of anogenital cancer.

Authors:  H zur Hausen
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.616

10.  Human papillomavirus infection and other risk factors for cervical neoplasia: a case-control study.

Authors:  E A Morrison; G Y Ho; S H Vermund; G L Goldberg; A S Kadish; K F Kelley; R D Burk
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1991-08-19       Impact factor: 7.396

View more
  21 in total

1.  Effect of nonionic detergents on amplification of human papillomavirus DNA with consensus primers MY09 and MY11.

Authors:  F Coutlée; H Voyer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Identification of papillomaviruses in scrapings from bovine warts by use of the polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  N Bloch; R H Sutton; M Breen; P B Spradbrow
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 3.  Anal human papillomavirus and anal cancer.

Authors:  P Tilston
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Use of PGMY primers in L1 consensus PCR improves detection of human papillomavirus DNA in genital samples.

Authors:  François Coutlée; Patti Gravitt; Janet Kornegay; Catherine Hankins; Harriet Richardson; Normand Lapointe; Hélène Voyer; Eduardo Franco
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer.

Authors:  F X Bosch; A Lorincz; N Muñoz; C J L M Meijer; K V Shah
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  International proficiency study of a consensus L1 PCR assay for the detection and typing of human papillomavirus DNA: evaluation of accuracy and intralaboratory and interlaboratory agreement.

Authors:  Janet R Kornegay; Michel Roger; Philip O Davies; Amanda P Shepard; Nayana A Guerrero; Belen Lloveras; Darren Evans; François Coutlée
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of ViraPap, southern hybridization, and polymerase chain reaction methods for human papillomavirus identification in an epidemiological investigation of cervical cancer.

Authors:  A C Gibbs
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  PCR detection of human papillomavirus: comparison between MY09/MY11 and GP5+/GP6+ primer systems.

Authors:  W Qu; G Jiang; Y Cruz; C J Chang; G Y Ho; R S Klein; R D Burk
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Nonisotopic detection of human papillomavirus DNA in clinical specimens using a consensus PCR and a generic probe mix in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay format.

Authors:  J R Kornegay; A P Shepard; C Hankins; E Franco; N Lapointe; H Richardson; F Coutleé
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Detection of human papillomavirus DNA in cervical lavage specimens by a nonisotopic consensus PCR assay.

Authors:  F Coutlée; D Provencher; H Voyer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.