Literature DB >> 1329683

Continuing evolution of the pelvic pouch procedure.

Z Cohen1, R S McLeod, W Stephen, H S Stern, B O'Connor, R Reznick.   

Abstract

The results of the pelvic pouch procedure were reviewed to assess the surgical complication rate and outcome of patients who had had the procedure performed with a stapled ileo-anal anastomosis with and without a defunctioning ileostomy. Between December 1982 and March 1992, 483 patients underwent a pelvic pouch (PP) procedure. Patients were divided into three groups: group I consisted of 325 patients (178 men and boys and 147 women and girls) who underwent a PP procedure with a handsewn ileoanal anastomosis (IAA) with a defunctioning loop ileostomy. In group II, there were 87 patients (47 men and boys and 40 women and girls) who had a stapled IAA with a defunctioning ileostomy. Group III patients consisted of 71 patients (43 men and boys and 28 women and girls) who had a stapled IAA with no covering ileostomy. Assessment was made of the IAA leak rate, the surgical complications, the reoperation rate, and functional outcome. Early surgical complications included 40 (12%) IAA leaks in group I patients compared with only six (7%) leaks in group II patients who had a stapled IAA (p < 0.05). In group III patients, who had a stapled IAA but no covering ileostomy, there were 13 leaks (18%). Eleven of these 13 leaks healed spontaneously with tube drainage; one patient remains with a rectal tube in place 6 weeks after operation, and only one patient has required a reoperation (defunctioning ileostomy). Functionally, all patients with a healed IAA after a leak have had an excellent result comparable to those without a leak. Patients who were male, older than age 40, on steroids, and had had a true one-stage PP procedure, had a greater risk of developing an IAA leak. In two patients, there was intraoperative difficulty, and one of these patients had an IAA leak after operation. Disease activity at the resection margin and patient weight did not affect the leak rate. Our results suggest that the IAA leak rate is significantly reduced in patients with a stapled IAA with an ileostomy compared with those with a handsewn IAA. Omission of the defunctioning ileostomy is associated with a higher IAA leak rate, but spontaneous healing occurs in almost all patients without impairment of functional results. In patients in whom the ileostomy is omitted, the IAA leak rate is greatest in male patients who have undergone a true one-stage PP procedure, are on steroids, and are older than age 40.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1329683      PMCID: PMC1242660          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199210000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  23 in total

1.  Stapled ileoanal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis without a temporary diverting ileostomy.

Authors:  H J Sugerman; H H Newsome; G Decosta; A M Zfass
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Prospective randomized trial comparing anal function after hand sewn ileoanal anastomosis with mucosectomy versus stapled ileoanal anastomosis without mucosectomy in restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  S Choen; A Tsunoda; R J Nicholls
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Incidence of dysplasia in the anorectal mucosa in patients having restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  A Tsunoda; I C Talbot; R J Nicholls
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Comparison of restorative proctocolectomy with and without covering ileostomy in ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  H J Järvinen; P Luukkonen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Experience of restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir.

Authors:  W G Everett
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Cancer in an ileoanal reservoir: a new late complication?

Authors:  H Stern; S Walfisch; B Mullen; R McLeod; Z Cohen
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis without ileostomy.

Authors:  S Galandiuk; B G Wolff; R R Dozois; R W Beart
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis without temporary, diverting ileostomy.

Authors:  A M Metcalf; R R Dozois; K A Kelly; B G Wolff
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Ileoanal anastomosis without covering ileostomy.

Authors:  M Matikainen; J Santavirta; K M Hiltunen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Carcinoma of the rectal pouch following restorative proctocolectomy. Report of a case.

Authors:  D Puthu; N Rajan; R Rao; L Rao; P Venugopal
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  26 in total

1.  A comparison of hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) following proctocolectomy: a meta-analysis of 4183 patients.

Authors:  Richard E Lovegrove; Vasilis A Constantinides; Alexander G Heriot; Thanos Athanasiou; Ara Darzi; Feza H Remzi; R John Nicholls; Victor W Fazio; Paris P Tekkis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Surgical site infection following surgery for inflammatory bowel disease in patients with clean-contaminated wounds.

Authors:  Motoi Uchino; Hiroki Ikeuchi; Toshie Tsuchida; Kazuhiko Nakajima; Naohiro Tomita; Yoshio Takesue
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Risk factors for ileoanal J pouch-related septic complications in ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Udo A Heuschen; Ulf Hinz; Erik H Allemeyer; Frank Autschbach; Josef Stern; Matthias Lucas; Christian Herfarth; Gundi Heuschen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Complications of ileoanal pouches.

Authors:  Emre Gorgun; Feza H Remzi
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2004-02

5.  Ileal pouch anal anastomosis without ileal diversion.

Authors:  H J Sugerman; E L Sugerman; J G Meador; H H Newsome; J M Kellum; E J DeMaria
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  The use of an ileostomy connector to diminish the frequency of defecation prior to ileostomy closure in patients with a pelvic pouch.

Authors:  K Maeda; M Hashimoto; J Koh; O Yamamoto; Y Hosoda; Y Morikawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Impact of defunctioning loop ileostomy on outcome after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Rudolf Mennigen; Norbert Senninger; Matthias Bruwer; Emile Rijcken
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Severity of inflammation as a risk factor for ileo-anal anastomotic leak after a pouch procedure in ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Siham Zerhouni; Richard Kirsch; April Bakonyi; Brenda O'Connor; Harden Huang; Zane Cohen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Neutrophil-related immunoinflammatory disturbance in steroid-overdosed ulcerative colitis patients.

Authors:  Shigeyuki Yoshiyama; Chikao Miki; Yoshiki Okita; Toshimitsu Araki; Keiichi Uchida; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 7.527

10.  Total laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: prospective series of 82 patients.

Authors:  Jérémie H Lefevre; Frédéric Bretagnol; Mehdi Ouaïssi; Philippe Taleb; Arnaud Alves; Yves Panis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.