Literature DB >> 1303383

Evaluation of new methods for composite repair.

E J Swift1, B D LeValley, D B Boyer.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the effectiveness of air abrasion (sandblasting), hydrofluoric acid (HF) etching, and acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) for composite repair. Five different composites (three hybrids, one small-particle, and one microfill) were used to test the effects of different compositions and particle sizes. A phosphonate resin bonding agent was used for all repair procedures. In general, air abrasion provided the strongest repairs, approximately 60% of cohesive strength. The effect of HF varied with different composites, either improving or reducing the repair strength. APF gave the lowest interfacial bond strengths for all composites except the microfill.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1303383     DOI: 10.1016/0109-5641(92)90020-d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  22 in total

1.  Effect of three surface conditioning methods to improve bond strength of particulate filler resin composites.

Authors:  M Ozcan; P Alander; P K Vallittu; M-C Huysmans; W Kalk
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Effect of different mechanical and chemical surface treatments on the repaired bond strength of an indirect composite resin.

Authors:  Soodabeh Kimyai; Siavash Savadi Oskoee; Narmin Mohammadi; Sahand Rikhtegaran; Mahmoud Bahari; Parnian Alizadeh Oskoee; Hafez Vahedpour
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Effect of sonic-activated resin composites on the repair of aged substrates: an in vitro investigation.

Authors:  Nicoleta Ilie; Marie-Thérèse Oberthür
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Effect of thermocycling on the bond strength of composite resin to bur and laser treated composite resin.

Authors:  Özden Özel Bektas; Digdem Eren; Seyda Herguner Siso; Gulsah E Akin
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Comparative efficacy of Er,Cr:YSGG and Er:YAG lasers for etching of composite for orthodontic bracket bonding.

Authors:  Amir Hossein Mirhashemi; Nasim Chiniforush; Nastaran Sharifi; Amir Mehdi Hosseini
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.161

6.  Effects of surface conditioning on repair bond strengths of non-aged and aged microhybrid, nanohybrid, and nanofilled composite resins.

Authors:  Margareta Rinastiti; Mutlu Özcan; Widowati Siswomihardjo; Henk J Busscher
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Effects of cyclic loading on the shear bond strength of metal orthodontic brackets bonded to resin composite veneer surface using different conditioning protocols.

Authors:  Shaza M Hammad; Mai S El Banna
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2013-06-23       Impact factor: 2.750

8.  Repair bond strength of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled resin composites: effect of substrate resin type, surface conditioning and ageing.

Authors:  Mutlu Özcan; Pedro Henrique Corazza; Susana Maria Salazar Marocho; Silvia Helena Barbosa; Marco Antonio Bottino
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Microleakage of repaired class V silorane and nano-hybrid composite restorations after preparation with erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser and diamond bur.

Authors:  Batu Can Yaman; Begüm Güray Efes; Can Dörter; Yavuz Gömeç; Dina Erdilek; Oktay Yazıcıoğlu
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 3.161

10.  In vitro repair of fractured fiber-reinforced cusp-replacing composite restorations.

Authors:  Willem M M Fennis; Cees M Kreulen; Arzu Tezvergil; Lippo V J Lassila; Pekka K Vallittu; Nico H J Creugers
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2011-09-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.