Literature DB >> 23873595

Effect of different mechanical and chemical surface treatments on the repaired bond strength of an indirect composite resin.

Soodabeh Kimyai1, Siavash Savadi Oskoee, Narmin Mohammadi, Sahand Rikhtegaran, Mahmoud Bahari, Parnian Alizadeh Oskoee, Hafez Vahedpour.   

Abstract

This study compared the effects of two mechanical surface preparation techniques, air abrasion and Nd:YAG laser, with the use of two adhesive systems, self-etch and etch and rinse, on the repair bond strengths of an indirect composite resin. One hundred fifty cylindrical samples of an indirect composite resin were prepared and randomly divided into six groups (n = 25). In groups 1-3, the composite resin surfaces were respectively prepared as follows: no roughening, roughening by air abrasion, and roughening by Nd:YAG laser, followed by application of an etch-and-rinse adhesive. In groups 4-6, the preparation techniques were respectively the same as those in groups 1-3, followed by application of a self-etch adhesive. Subsequently, a direct composite resin was added and repair bond strengths were measured. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey's test. Mean bond strength value was significant based on the preparation technique (P < 0.001), i.e., in air abrasion and Nd:YAG laser groups, bond strengths were significantly higher compared to no-preparation groups (P < 0.0005). There were significant differences in bond strength values between air abrasion and Nd:YAG laser groups, with significantly higher values in air abrasion groups (P < 0.0005). However, there were no significant differences in bond strength values between the adhesive systems. Furthermore, the cumulative effects of the adhesive system and the surface preparation technique were not significant. Surface preparation of the indirect composite resin with air abrasion and Nd:YAG laser resulted in a significant increase in the repair bond strength, with air abrasion being more effective. There were no significant differences in bond strength between the two adhesives.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23873595     DOI: 10.1007/s10103-013-1391-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


  19 in total

1.  The effect of various surface treatments and bonding agents on the repaired strength of heat-treated composites.

Authors:  C Lucena-Martín; S González-López; J M Navajas-Rodríguez de Mondelo
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  Selective removal of residual composite from dental enamel surfaces using the third harmonic of a Q-switched Nd:YAG laser.

Authors:  Robert Alexander; John Xie; Daniel Fried
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.025

3.  Comparison of the effect of three mechanical surface treatments on the repair bond strength of a laboratory composite.

Authors:  Soodabeh Kimyai; Narmin Mohammadi; Elmira Jafari Navimipour; Sahand Rikhtegaran
Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  Evaluation of varied repair protocols applied to aged composite resin.

Authors:  Tammy Bonstein; Davis Garlapo; John Donarummo; Peter J Bush
Journal:  J Adhes Dent       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Micro-tensile bond strength between a resin cement and an aluminous ceramic treated with Nd:YAG laser, Rocatec System, or aluminum oxide sandblasting.

Authors:  Bruno Lopes da Silveira; Adriane Paglia; Luiz Henrique Burnett; Rosemary Sadami Arai Shinkai; Carlos de Paula Eduardo; Ana Maria Spohr
Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Porcelain conditioning with Nd:YAG and Er:YAG laser for bracket bonding in orthodontics.

Authors:  Maryam Poosti; Arezoo Jahanbin; Pirouzeh Mahdavi; Sara Mehrnoush
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  Tensile bond strength of a one-bottle adhesive system to indirect composites treated with Er:YAG laser, air abrasion, or fluoridric acid.

Authors:  Luiz Henrique Burnett; Rosemary S A Shinkai; Carlos De Paula Eduardo
Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Evaluation of new methods for composite repair.

Authors:  E J Swift; B D LeValley; D B Boyer
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.304

9.  Bond strength of Gradia veneering composite to fibre-reinforced composite.

Authors:  M S Keski-Nikkola; P M Alander; L V J Lassila; P K Vallittu
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.837

10.  Tensile bond strength of indirect composites luted with three new self-adhesive resin cements to dentin.

Authors:  Cafer Türkmen; Meral Durkan; Hale Cimilli; Mustafa Öksüz
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 2.698

View more
  2 in total

1.  Reparability of giomer using different mechanical surface treatments.

Authors:  Saba Arami; Soodabeh Kimyai; Parnian-Alizadeh Oskoee; Mehdi Daneshpooy; Sahand Rikhtegaran; Mahmoud Bahari; Mehdi-Abed Kahnamoii
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-04-01

2.  Evaluation of the repair capacities and color stabilities of a resin nanoceramic and hybrid CAD/CAM blocks.

Authors:  Hasibe Sevilay Bahadır; Yusuf Bayraktar
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 1.904

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.