Literature DB >> 1301217

Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

.   

Abstract

The National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on Gallstones and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy brought together surgeons, endoscopists, hepatologists, gastroenterologists, internists, radiologists, and epidemiologists as well as other health care professionals and the public to address (1) the indications for treatment of patients with gallstones; (2) the role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in treating patients with gallstones; (3) the role of alternative medical and surgical treatments for gallstones; (4) the comparative results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with open cholecystectomy and other available treatments; (5) techniques for detecting and treating bile duct stones with or without laparoscopic cholecystectomy; and (6) future directions for research in prevention and management of gallstone disease and in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Following 2 days of presentations by experts and extensive discussion by the audience, a consensus panel weighed the evidence and prepared their consensus statement. Among their findings, the panel concluded that (1) most patients who experience symptoms of gallstones should be treated; (2) in comparison with open cholecystectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy provides a safe and effective treatment for most patients with symptomatic gallstones and has become the treatment of choice for many patients; (3) patients who are not good candidates for laparoscopic cholecystectomy include those with generalized peritonitis, septic shock from cholangitis, severe acute pancreatitis, endstage cirrhosis, and gallbladder cancer; (4) laparoscopic cholecystectomy decreases pain and disability without increasing mortality and morbidity and can be performed at an equal or lower cost than open cholecystectomy; and (5) every effort should be made to ensure that surgeons performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy are properly trained and credentialed. The full text of the consensus panel's statement follows.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1301217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NIH Consens Statement        ISSN: 1080-1707


  32 in total

1.  Do practice guidelines augment drug utilisation review?

Authors:  E A Chrischilles; K Gondek
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Review of 100 cases of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Eun Jung Koo; Soon Hwa Youn; Yang Hyun Baek; Young Hoon Roh; Hong Jo Choi; Young Hoon Kim; Ghap Joong Jung
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2012-02-27

Review 3.  New minimally invasive approaches for cholecystectomy: Review of literature.

Authors:  Martin Gaillard; Hadrien Tranchart; Panagiotis Lainas; Ibrahim Dagher
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-10-27

4.  Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: transgastric cholecystectomy in a survival porcine model.

Authors:  S Perretta; B Dallemagne; D Coumaros; J Marescaux
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Evaluating systemic stress response in single port vs. multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Colleen G C McGregor; Mikael H Sodergren; Alec Aslanyan; Victoria J Wright; Sanjay Purkayastha; Ara Darzi; Paraskevas Paraskeva
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Percutaneous management of biliary emergencies.

Authors:  Kent T Sato
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.513

7.  One hundred and two consecutive robotic-assisted minimally invasive colectomies--an outcome and technical update.

Authors:  Franziska Huettner; Paul E Pacheco; Jamie L Doubet; Michael J Ryan; Danuta I Dynda; David L Crawford
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Will laparoscopic lysis of adhesions become the standard of care? Evaluating trends and outcomes in laparoscopic management of small-bowel obstruction using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Database.

Authors:  Kevin Y Pei; David Asuzu; Kimberly A Davis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Ambulatory and admitted laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients have comparable outcomes but different functional health status.

Authors:  R E Burney; K R Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-03-18       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Twenty years after Erich Muhe: Persisting controversies with the gold standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Kalpesh Jani; P S Rajan; K Sendhilkumar; C Palanivelu
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.407

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.