Literature DB >> 1301111

The CARES: a generic measure of health-related quality of life for patients with cancer.

P A Ganz1, C A Schag, J J Lee, M S Sim.   

Abstract

In spite of the prevalence of neoplastic disorders as a cause of chronic illness, very few of the currently available generic measures of health-related quality of life or health status have been utilized with cancer patients. In this paper we reviewed our studies with the Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System (CARES), a cancer-specific measure of rehabilitation needs and quality of life. We present data to demonstrate that the CARES is a generic measure of health-related quality of life, suitable for use in the many different diseases called cancer. The data that form the basis for this paper were collected during a decade of research on the CARES. This paper represents the first discussion of the performance of the CARES across separate cancer sites and phases of the disease. In addition, we demonstrated that the CARES is responsive to changes in health-related quality of life over time. Finally, we will discuss the application of the CARES in clinical and research settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1301111     DOI: 10.1007/bf00435432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  11 in total

1.  Cancer statistics, 1991.

Authors:  C C Boring; T S Squires; T Tong
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Assessing problems of cancer patients: psychometric properties of the cancer inventory of problem situations.

Authors:  C A Schag; R L Heinrich; R L Aadland; P A Ganz
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  Breast conservation versus mastectomy. Is there a difference in psychological adjustment or quality of life in the year after surgery?

Authors:  P A Ganz; A C Schag; J J Lee; M L Polinsky; S J Tan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Development of a comprehensive quality of life measurement tool: CARES.

Authors:  C A Schag; R L Heinrich
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.990

5.  Quantitative and qualitative assessment of a case management program for cancer patients.

Authors:  M L Polinsky; C Fred; P A Ganz
Journal:  Health Soc Work       Date:  1991-08

6.  Psychosexual adaptation to breast cancer surgery.

Authors:  W H Wolberg; E P Romsaas; M A Tanner; J F Malec
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Psychosocial status in chronic illness. A comparative analysis of six diagnostic groups.

Authors:  B R Cassileth; E J Lusk; T B Strouse; D S Miller; L L Brown; P A Cross; A N Tenaglia
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-08-23       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  CAncer Rehabilitation Evaluation System--short form (CARES-SF). A cancer specific rehabilitation and quality of life instrument.

Authors:  C A Schag; P A Ganz; R L Heinrich
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

Authors:  A L Stewart; S Greenfield; R D Hays; K Wells; W H Rogers; S D Berry; E A McGlynn; J E Ware
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Psychological distress after initial treatment for breast cancer: a comparison of partial and total mastectomy.

Authors:  E Maunsell; J Brisson; L Deschenes
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 6.437

View more
  43 in total

1.  Randomized trials with quality of life endpoints: are doctors' ratings of patients' physical symptoms interchangeable with patients' self-ratings?

Authors:  R J Stephens; P Hopwood; D J Girling; D Machin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Quality-of-life assessment in small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  P Fayers
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  If I am in the mood, I enjoy it: an exploration of cancer-related fatigue and sexual functioning in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Kate Webber; Kelly Mok; Barbara Bennett; Andrew R Lloyd; Michael Friedlander; Ilona Juraskova; David Goldstein
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-08-11

4.  A comparison of three sets of criteria for determining the presence of differential item functioning using ordinal logistic regression.

Authors:  Paul K Crane; Laura E Gibbons; Katja Ocepek-Welikson; Karon Cook; David Cella; Kaavya Narasimhalu; Ron D Hays; Jeanne A Teresi
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Evaluation of quality of life for diverse patient populations.

Authors:  K R Yabroff; B P Linas; K Schulman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 6.  Quality of life measures in cancer chemotherapy: methodology and implications.

Authors:  P A Ganz
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Quality of life trajectories after diagnosis of gynecologic cancer: a theoretically based approach.

Authors:  Brian D Gonzalez; Sharon L Manne; Jerod Stapleton; Shannon Myers-Virtue; Melissa Ozga; David Kissane; Carolyn Heckman; Mark Morgan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Depression and sexual adjustment following breast cancer in low-income Hispanic and non-Hispanic White women.

Authors:  Kysa M Christie; Beth E Meyerowitz; Rose C Maly
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Information and service needs for young adult cancer patients.

Authors:  Brad Zebrack
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 10.  Methods and problems in measuring quality of life.

Authors:  D F Cella
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.