Literature DB >> 10147229

Quality of life measures in cancer chemotherapy: methodology and implications.

P A Ganz1.   

Abstract

Quality of life has been an implied outcome of medical care since ancient times, yet only recently have tools become available to measure quality of life in a systematic fashion. Cancer is one of the chronic diseases where quality of life outcomes have been particularly salient. Currently, there are a wide variety of generic and cancer-specific instruments that are being used to evaluate the impact of cancer chemotherapy on the patient's quality of life. Most of these instruments rely on patient self-report rather than expert evaluation. The addition of quality-of-life (QOL) assessment to pharmacological investigations of cancer chemotherapy may enhance evaluation of clinical outcomes, as well as identify unsuspected drug toxicities. Clinicians, researchers and pharmaceutical companies are more frequently incorporating these measures into the design of cancer treatment protocols. Data on the performance of these tools should become more widely available in the near future, leading to refinements in the selection and use of specific instruments for different purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 10147229     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199405050-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  69 in total

1.  Political and ethical implications of using quality of life as an outcome measure.

Authors:  H E Dean
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.315

Review 2.  Quality of life: what is it? How should it be measured?

Authors:  N K Aaronson
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.990

3.  A modular approach to quality-of-life assessment in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  N K Aaronson; M Bullinger; S Ahmedzai
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  1988

4.  The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population.

Authors:  A L Stewart; R D Hays; J E Ware
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Do patients' evaluations of a future health state change when they actually enter that state?

Authors:  H A Llewellyn-Thomas; H J Sutherland; E C Thiel
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Breast conservation versus mastectomy. Is there a difference in psychological adjustment or quality of life in the year after surgery?

Authors:  P A Ganz; A C Schag; J J Lee; M L Polinsky; S J Tan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Development of a comprehensive quality of life measurement tool: CARES.

Authors:  C A Schag; R L Heinrich
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.990

Review 8.  Measuring health-related quality of life.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; D H Feeny; D L Patrick
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Characteristics of women at risk for psychosocial distress in the year after breast cancer.

Authors:  C A Schag; P A Ganz; M L Polinsky; C Fred; K Hirji; L Petersen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  The development of a method for assessing the quality of life of cancer patients.

Authors:  P J Selby; J A Chapman; J Etazadi-Amoli; D Dalley; N F Boyd
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  7 in total

1.  Refining quality of life: validating a multidimensional factor measure in the severe mentally ill.

Authors:  S L Bishop; D P Walling; S G Dott; C C Folkes; J Bucy
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Pharmacoeconomic aspects in the treatment of curable and incurable cancer.

Authors:  V Jønsson; S R Clausen; M M Hansen
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Evaluation of quality of life for diverse patient populations.

Authors:  K R Yabroff; B P Linas; K Schulman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 4.  Health-related quality-of-life evaluation in HIV-infected patients. A review of the literature.

Authors:  J B de Boer; F S van Dam; M A Sprangers
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Cancer supportive care, improving the quality of life for cancer patients. A program evaluation report.

Authors:  Ernest Rosenbaum; Holly Gautier; Pat Fobair; Eric Neri; Bernadette Festa; Margaret Hawn; Alexandra Andrews; Nama Hirshberger; Sabrina Selim; David Spiegel
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-02-26       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Quality of life assessment in women with breast cancer: benefits, acceptability and utilization.

Authors:  Sheila Perry; Theresa L Kowalski; Chih-Hung Chang
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 7.  Outcomes and quality of life following breast cancer treatment in older women: when, why, how much, and what do women want?

Authors:  Jeanne Mandelblatt; Melissa Figueiredo; Jennifer Cullen
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2003-09-17       Impact factor: 3.186

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.