Literature DB >> 12973965

Clinical evaluation of the HemoSonic monitor in cardiac surgical patients in the ICU.

D Moxon1, M Pinder, P V van Heerden, R W Parsons.   

Abstract

The HemoSonic monitor (HemoSonic 100, Arrow International, Reading, PA, U.S.A.) is a minimally invasive device to determine cardiac output by means of M-mode and pulsed Doppler ultrasound. We evaluated the HemoSonic monitor by comparing its output to paired measurements obtained by the standard thermodilution technique in patients who had recently undergone cardiac surgery. Forty-seven paired measurements were carried out in 13 patients. The correlation between the two methods was very good with a correlation coefficient of 0.81. Comparison of the two techniques using the method described by Bland and Altman showed a mean of the differences of -0.23. The limits of agreement were -2.35 to 1.89. There was a reduced correlation between techniques at higher values of cardiac output. We concluded that the HemoSonic monitor has a place in intensive care monitoring, with good correlation with cardiac output measured by the thermodilution technique. It appears to be less suitable for use in patients with a high cardiac output state. The oesophageal probe is moderately difficult for patients to tolerate and is only appropriate for use in sedated patients. The accuracy of the device is somewhat operator-dependent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12973965     DOI: 10.1177/0310057X0303100410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care        ISSN: 0310-057X            Impact factor:   1.669


  8 in total

Review 1.  Transesophageal Doppler devices: A technical review.

Authors:  Patrick Schober; Stephan A Loer; Lothar A Schwarte
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Methods in pharmacology: measurement of cardiac output.

Authors:  Bart F Geerts; Leon P Aarts; Jos R Jansen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Minimally invasive monitoring of cardiac output in the cardiac surgery intensive care unit.

Authors:  Jamal A Alhashemi; Maurizio Cecconi; Giorgio della Rocca; Maxime Cannesson; Christoph K Hofer
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2010-09

Review 4.  Haemodynamic monitoring in acute heart failure.

Authors:  Maurizio Cecconi; Toby E Reynolds; Nawaf Al-Subaie; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.214

5.  Accuracy of cardiac output measurements during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: according to the vessel anastomosis sites.

Authors:  Sung Yong Park; Dae Hee Kim; Han Bum Joe; Ji Young Yoo; Jin Soo Kim; Min Kang; Yong Woo Hong
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-05-24

Review 6.  High-output Cardiac Failure: A Forgotten Phenotype in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Diane Xavier de Ávila; Humberto Villacorta; Wolney de Andrade Martins; Evandro Tinoco Mesquita
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2022

7.  Comparison of three perioperative fluid regimes for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy : A prospective randomized dose-finding study.

Authors:  Ingrid R A M Mertens zur Borg; Manuela Di Biase; Serge Verbrugge; Jan N M Ijzermans; Diederik Gommers
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Cardiac output measurements via echocardiography versus thermodilution: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yun Zhang; Yan Wang; Jing Shi; Zhiqiang Hua; Jinyu Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.