Literature DB >> 12973846

Prognosis for patients with thin cutaneous melanoma: long-term survival data from New South Wales Central Cancer Registry and the Sydney Melanoma Unit.

J Gregory McKinnon1, Xue Qin Yu, William H McCarthy, John F Thompson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Estimates of long-term survival for patients with thin (< or = 1 mm) primary cutaneous melanomas vary widely. Two separate methods were used to study the survival of patients with melanoma from New South Wales (NSW), Australia, and from the Sydney Melanoma Unit (SMU).
METHODS: The NSW Central Cancer Registry (NSWCCR) provided data on all patients who were diagnosed with cutaneous melanomas that measured < or = 1 mm thick between 1983 and 1998, inclusive. Patients with metastases at the time of diagnosis were not included, leaving 18,088 patients for analysis. The SMU data base was analyzed to extract data for all patients with thin melanomas who met the same criteria from 1979 to 1998, inclusive. All patients who had their primary tumors treated definitively elsewhere were excluded, leaving 2746 patients for analysis. Ten-year Kaplan-Meier survival rates were calculated, and significant differences were determined using log-rank analysis. Prognostic factors were evaluated with Cox proportional hazards analysis.
RESULTS: The NSWCCR analysis revealed a 10-year survival rate of 96.4%. The 10-year survival rate for patients at SMU was 92.7%. Among the patients at SMU who died, the median time to recurrence was 49.8 months, and the median time to death was 65.9 months. The 10-year survival for patients at SMU who had lesions that measured < or = 0.75 mm was 96.9% compared with 84.3% for patients who had lesions that measured 0.76-1.0 mm. For patients who had ulcerated melanomas measuring < or = 1 mm thick, the 10-year survival rate was 83%, compared with 92.3% for patients who had nonulcerated melanomas.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study confirmed the excellent survival rate for patients with thin melanomas. Higher-risk subsets of patients who may warrant consideration for aggressive investigation and treatment are identifiable. Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.DOI 10.1002/cncr.11624

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12973846     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  28 in total

1.  Prognostic value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in 121 low-risk melanomas (tumour thickness <1.00 mm) on the basis of a long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Torsten Hinz; Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar; Anja Wierzbicki; Tobias Höller; Jörg Wenzel; Hans-Jürgen Biersack; Thomas Bieber; Monika-H Schmid-Wendtner
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Authors:  Mark B Faries; Donald L Morton
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.929

3.  Miscoding of Melanoma Thickness in SEER: Research and Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Phyllis A Gimotty; Ronald Shore; Nancy L Lozon; Jeanne Whitlock; Sidan He; Fawn D Vigneau; Lois Dickie; David E Elder; Xiaowei Xu; Ann G Schwartz; DuPont Guerry
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 8.551

4.  Clark level risk stratifies patients with mitogenic thin melanomas for sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Authors:  Edmund K Bartlett; Phyllis A Gimotty; Andrew J Sinnamon; Heather Wachtel; Robert E Roses; Lynn Schuchter; Xiaowei Xu; David E Elder; Michael Ming; Rosalie Elenitsas; DuPont Guerry; Rachel R Kelz; Brian J Czerniecki; Douglas L Fraker; Giorgos C Karakousis
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Antimetastatic activity and low systemic toxicity of tetradecyl gallate in a preclinical melanoma mouse model.

Authors:  Claudriana Locatelli; Deborah Regina Carvalho; Alessandra Mascarello; Clarissa Amorin Silva de Cordova; Rosendo Augusto Yunes; Ricardo Jose Nunes; Celso Pilati; Tânia Beatriz Creczynski-Pasa
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 6.  Follow-up in patients with low-risk cutaneous melanoma: is it worth it?

Authors:  Ulrike Leiter; Thomas Eigentler; Claus Garbe
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2014-12-04

7.  Activation of the extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK) pathway in human melanoma.

Authors:  L Zhuang; C S Lee; R A Scolyer; S W McCarthy; A A Palmer; X D Zhang; J F Thompson; L P Bron; P Hersey
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  A pilot study on morphology and the mechanism involved in linearly patterned programmed cell necrosis in melanoma.

Authors:  Chunrong Han; Baoc Un Sun; Wei Wang; Wen Juan Cai; Dan Lou; Yan Sun; Xiulan Zhao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  Identification of Patients with Intermediate Thickness Melanoma at Low Risk for Sentinel Lymph Node Positivity.

Authors:  Edmund K Bartlett; Madalyn G Peters; Anne Blair; Mark S Etherington; David E Elder; Xiaowei G Xu; DuPont Guerry; Michael E Ming; Douglas L Fraker; Brian J Czerniecki; Phyllis A Gimotty; Giorgos C Karakousis
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Role of key-regulator genes in melanoma susceptibility and pathogenesis among patients from South Italy.

Authors:  Milena Casula; Antonio Muggiano; Antonio Cossu; Mario Budroni; Corrado Caracò; Paolo A Ascierto; Elena Pagani; Ignazio Stanganelli; Sergio Canzanella; Mariacristina Sini; Grazia Palomba; Giuseppe Palmieri
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-10-03       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.