Literature DB >> 12972521

Addition of either lonidamine or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor does not improve survival in early breast cancer patients treated with high-dose epirubicin and cyclophosphamide.

Paola Papaldo1, Massimo Lopez, Enrico Cortesi, Eugenio Cammilluzzi, Mauro Antimi, Edmondo Terzoli, Giuseppe Lepidini, Patrizia Vici, Carlo Barone, Gianluigi Ferretti, Serena Di Cosimo, Cecilia Nistico, Paolo Carlini, Francesca Conti, Luigi Di Lauro, Claudio Botti, Carlo Vitucci, Alessandra Fabi, Diana Giannarelli, Paolo Marolla.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Lonidamine (LND) can enhance the activity of anthracyclines in patients with metastatic breast cancer. A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial was designed to determine whether the association of LND with high-dose epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide (EC) could improve disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with early breast cancer (BC) compared with EC alone. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was added to maintain the EC dose-intensity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From October 1991 to April 1994, 506 patients with stage I/II BC were randomly assigned to four groups: (A) epirubicin 120 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 administered intravenously on day 1 every 21 days for four cycles (124 patients); (B) EC plus LND 450 mg/d administered orally (125 patients); (C) EC plus G-CSF administered subcutaneously (129 patients); (D) EC plus LND plus G-CSF (128 patients).
RESULTS: Median follow-up was 55 months. Five-year DFS rate was similar for LND (B+D groups; 69.6%) versus non-LND arms (A+C groups; 70.3%) and G-CSF (C+D groups; 67.2%) versus non-G-CSF arms (A+B groups; 72.9%). Five-year overall survival (OS) was comparable in LND (79.1%) versus non-LND arms (81.3%) and in G-CSF (80.6%) versus non-G-CSF arms (79.6%). DFS and OS distributions in LND and G-CSF arms did not change according to tumor size, node, receptor, and menopausal status. G-CSF dramatically reduced hematologic toxicity without having a significant impact on dose-intensity (98.1% v 95.5% for C+D and A+B groups, respectively).
CONCLUSION: EC is active and well tolerated in patients with early breast cancer. The addition of LND or G-CSF does not improve DFS or OS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12972521     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  23 in total

Review 1.  Filling in the gaps: reporting of concurrent supportive care therapies in breast cancer chemotherapy trials.

Authors:  Orit Freedman; Eitan Amir; Camilla Zimmermann; Mark Clemons
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  The combination of the novel glycolysis inhibitor 3-BrOP and rapamycin is effective against neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Alejandro G Levy; Peter E Zage; Lauren J Akers; Maurizio L Ghisoli; Zhao Chen; Wendy Fang; Sankaranarayanan Kannan; Timothy Graham; Lizhi Zeng; Anna R Franklin; Peng Huang; Patrick A Zweidler-McKay
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 3.850

3.  A multicenter phase III prospective randomized trial of high-dose epirubicin in combination with cyclophosphamide (EC) versus docetaxel followed by EC in node-positive breast cancer. GOIM (Gruppo Oncologico Italia Meridionale) 9902 study.

Authors:  P Vici; M Brandi; F Giotta; P Foggi; F Schittulli; L Di Lauro; N Gebbia; B Massidda; G Filippelli; D Giannarelli; A Di Benedetto; M Mottolese; G Colucci; M Lopez
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 4.  Drugging cancer metabolism: Expectations vs. reality.

Authors:  David C Montrose; Lorenzo Galluzzi
Journal:  Int Rev Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 6.813

5.  Targeting Breast Cancer Stem Cell State Equilibrium through Modulation of Redox Signaling.

Authors:  Ming Luo; Li Shang; Michael D Brooks; Evelyn Jiagge; Yongyou Zhu; Johanna M Buschhaus; Sarah Conley; Melissa A Fath; April Davis; Elizabeth Gheordunescu; Yongfang Wang; Ramdane Harouaka; Ann Lozier; Daniel Triner; Sean McDermott; Sofia D Merajver; Gary D Luker; Douglas R Spitz; Max S Wicha
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 27.287

Review 6.  Targeting mitochondria for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Simone Fulda; Lorenzo Galluzzi; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 84.694

7.  SIRT4 protein suppresses tumor formation in genetic models of Myc-induced B cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Seung Min Jeong; Annie Lee; Jaewon Lee; Marcia C Haigis
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 8.  Cancer metabolism: a therapeutic perspective.

Authors:  Ubaldo E Martinez-Outschoorn; Maria Peiris-Pagés; Richard G Pestell; Federica Sotgia; Michael P Lisanti
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 66.675

9.  Adjudin disrupts spermatogenesis via the action of some unlikely partners: Eps8, Arp2/3 complex, drebrin E, PAR6 and 14-3-3.

Authors:  C Yan Cheng; Pearl Py Lie; Elissa Wp Wong; Dolores D Mruk; Bruno Silvestrini
Journal:  Spermatogenesis       Date:  2011-10-01

10.  Male contraceptive Adjudin is a potential anti-cancer drug.

Authors:  Qian Reuben Xie; Yewei Liu; Jiaxiang Shao; Jian Yang; Tengyuan Liu; Tingting Zhang; Boshi Wang; Dolores D Mruk; Bruno Silvestrini; C Yan Cheng; Weiliang Xia
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 5.858

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.