| Literature DB >> 29972798 |
Ming Luo1, Li Shang2, Michael D Brooks2, Evelyn Jiagge2, Yongyou Zhu2, Johanna M Buschhaus3, Sarah Conley2, Melissa A Fath4, April Davis2, Elizabeth Gheordunescu2, Yongfang Wang2, Ramdane Harouaka2, Ann Lozier2, Daniel Triner2, Sean McDermott2, Sofia D Merajver2, Gary D Luker3, Douglas R Spitz4, Max S Wicha5.
Abstract
Although breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs) display plasticity transitioning between quiescent mesenchymal-like (M) and proliferative epithelial-like (E) states, how this plasticity is regulated by metabolic or oxidative stress remains poorly understood. Here, we show that M- and E-BCSCs rely on distinct metabolic pathways and display markedly different sensitivities to inhibitors of glycolysis and redox metabolism. Metabolic or oxidative stress generated by 2DG, H2O2, or hypoxia promotes the transition of ROSlo M-BCSCs to a ROShi E-state. This transition is reversed by N-acetylcysteine and mediated by activation of the AMPK-HIF1α axis. Moreover, E-BCSCs exhibit robust NRF2-mediated antioxidant responses, rendering them vulnerable to ROS-induced differentiation and cytotoxicity following suppression of NRF2 or downstream thioredoxin (TXN) and glutathione (GSH) antioxidant pathways. Co-inhibition of glycolysis and TXN and GSH pathways suppresses tumor growth, tumor-initiating potential, and metastasis by eliminating both M- and E-BCSCs. Exploiting metabolic vulnerabilities of distinct BCSC states provides a novel therapeutic approach targeting this critical tumor cell population.Entities:
Keywords: HIF1α; NRF2; antioxidant responses; cancer stem cell metabolism; cancer stem cell plasticity; glycolysis; hypoxia; oxidative phosphorylation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29972798 PMCID: PMC6037414 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.06.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Metab ISSN: 1550-4131 Impact factor: 27.287