Literature DB >> 11341417

Specificity of the Oxford knee status questionnaire. The effect of disease of the hip or lumbar spine on patients' perception of knee disability.

W G Harcourt1, S H White, P Jones.   

Abstract

There is a need for the accurate measurement of the outcome after knee surgery. The Oxford Knee Score is being increasingly used since it is reported to be short, simple, inexpensive and validated. We sent the questionnaire to 346 patients awaiting surgery to the hip or lumbar spine. Only 11% of 141 patients with proximal pathology who denied knee problems gave a maximum score. Their mean score was substantially lower than expected at 28.7 (maximum 48), and was significantly lower than the score of 36.5 obtained from patients after total knee replacement. We therefore suggest that the frequent coexistence of hip or spinal pathology will significantly alter both the absolute score and any improvement to be expected after knee surgery. Although sensitive to disability originating from the knee the Oxford Knee Score is not sufficiently specific since it is heavily influenced by more proximal pathology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11341417     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.83b3.11298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  8 in total

1.  The Italian version of the Oxford 12-item Knee Questionnaire-cross-cultural adaptation and validation.

Authors:  R Padua; G Zanoli; E Ceccarelli; E Romanini; R Bondì; A Campi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-04-02       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Minimally invasive Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A note of caution!

Authors:  K L Luscombe; J Lim; P W Jones; S H White
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  THA with the ABG I prosthesis at 15 years. Excellent survival with minimal osteolysis.

Authors:  P N Baker; I A McMurtry; G Chuter; A Port; J Anderson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Can pain and function be distinguished in the Oxford Knee Score in a meaningful way? An exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.

Authors:  Kristina Harris; Jill Dawson; Helen Doll; Richard E Field; David W Murray; Raymond Fitzpatrick; Crispin Jenkinson; Andrew J Price; David J Beard
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  High correlation of the Oxford Knee Score with postoperative pain, but not with performance-based functioning.

Authors:  Ruud P van Hove; Richard M Brohet; Barend J van Royen; Peter A Nolte
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Predictors of patient relevant outcome after total hip replacement for osteoarthritis: a prospective study.

Authors:  A-K Nilsdotter; I F Petersson; E M Roos; L S Lohmander
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  The Oxford hip score: the patient's perspective.

Authors:  Vikki Wylde; Ian D Learmonth; Victoria J Cavendish
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2005-10-31       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  One-stage versus two-stage revision of the infected knee arthroplasty - a randomized multicenter clinical trial study protocol.

Authors:  Martin Lindberg-Larsen; Anders Odgaard; Charlotte Fredborg; Henrik Morville Schrøder
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 2.362

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.