Literature DB >> 12968820

Do commercial managed care members rate their health plans differently than Medicaid managed care members?

Patrick J Roohan1, Scott J Franko, Joseph P Anarella, Laura K Dellehunt, Foster C Gesten.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if members of commercial managed care and Medicaid managed care rate the experience with their health plans differently. DATA SOURCES: Data from both commercial and Medicaid Consumer Assessment of Health Plan Surveys (CAHPS) in New York State. STUDY
DESIGN: Regression models were used to determine the effect of population (commercial or Medicaid) on a member's rating of their health plan, controlling for health status, age, gender, education, race/ethnicity, number of office visits, and place of residence. DATA COLLECTION: Managed care plans are required to submit to the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) results of the annual commercial CAHPS survey. The NYSDOH conducted a survey of Medicaid enrollees using Medicaid CAHPS. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Medicaid managed care members in excellent or very good health rate their health plan higher than commercial members in excellent or very good health. There is no difference in health plan rating for commercial and Medicaid members in good, fair, or poor health. Older, less educated, black, and Hispanic members who live outside New York City are more likely to rate their managed care plan higher.
CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid members rating of their health care equals or exceeds ratings by commercial members.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12968820      PMCID: PMC1360936          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.00166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  13 in total

1.  Socioeconomic status and dissatisfaction among HMO enrollees.

Authors:  M J Carlson; J Blustein; N Fiorentino; F Prestianni
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Differences in CAHPS adult survey reports and ratings by race and ethnicity: an analysis of the National CAHPS benchmarking data 1.0.

Authors:  L S Morales; M N Elliott; R Weech-Maldonado; K L Spritzer; R D Hays
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Satisfaction with managed care.

Authors:  S K Ipsen; D Fosbinder; M Williams; M Warnick; K Lertwachara; L M Paita
Journal:  J Nurs Care Qual       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.597

4.  Does the effect of respondent characteristics on consumer assessments vary across health plans?

Authors:  A M Zaslavsky; L Zaborski; P D Cleary
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.929

5.  Consumer assessments of care for children and adults in health plans: how do they compare?

Authors:  Chunliu Zhan; Judith Sangl; Gregg S Meyer; Alan M Zaslavsky
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Sex differences in assessments of the quality of Medicare managed care.

Authors:  P D Cleary; A M Zaslavsky; M Cioffi
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr

Review 7.  Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care.

Authors:  P D Cleary; B J McNeil
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.730

8.  Patient satisfaction with care in programs for low income individuals.

Authors:  A G Mainous; C H Griffith; M M Love
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1999-10

9.  Gender and patient satisfaction in managed care plans: analysis of the 1999 HEDIS/CAHPS 2.0H Adult Survey.

Authors:  C S Weisman; J T Henderson; E Schifrin; M Romans; C M Clancy
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

10.  Patient sociodemographic characteristics as predictors of satisfaction with medical care: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J A Hall; M C Dornan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  8 in total

1.  Consumer experiences in a consumer-driven health plan.

Authors:  Jon B Christianson; Stephen T Parente; Roger Feldman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Multimethod evaluation of health policy change: an application to Medicaid managed care in a rural state.

Authors:  Howard Waitzkin; Michael Schillaci; Cathleen E Willging
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Gender differences in patients' perceptions of inpatient care.

Authors:  Marc N Elliott; William G Lehrman; Megan K Beckett; Elizabeth Goldstein; Katrin Hambarsoomian; Laura A Giordano
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  The impact of health plan delivery system organization on clinical quality and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Robin R Gillies; Kate Eresian Chenok; Stephen M Shortell; Gregory Pawlson; Julian J Wimbush
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Drivers of Inpatient Hospital Experience Using the HCAHPS Survey in a Canadian Setting.

Authors:  Kyle A Kemp; Nancy Chan; Brandi McCormack; Kathleen Douglas-England
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Organizational influences on patient perceptions of symptom management.

Authors:  Cynthia Thornton Bacon; Linda C Hughes; Barbara A Mark
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.228

7.  Corruption, inequality and population perception of healthcare quality in Europe.

Authors:  Zlatko Nikoloski; Elias Mossialos
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Access and satisfaction among children in Georgia's Medicaid Program and SCHIP: 2000 to 2003.

Authors:  E Kathleen Adams; Patricia Ketsche; Mei Zhou; Karen Minyard
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2008
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.