Literature DB >> 10555926

Patient satisfaction with care in programs for low income individuals.

A G Mainous1, C H Griffith, M M Love.   

Abstract

Although a variety of public and private programs provide care for low-income individuals, little is known about patient satisfaction across these programs. The objective of this study was to examine patient satisfaction across a variety of health insurance programs. A survey was conducted of randomly selected adults in Kentucky who had an outpatient visit in the past 12 months (616 with private insurance, 683 Medicaid recipients, 287 in private sector charity program for uninsured indigents). Patient satisfaction with multiple dimensions of their most recent outpatient visit was assessed. All insurance groups were generally satisfied with the care received in their most recent visit. For all 8 dimensions of patient satisfaction, the private insurance group was significantly higher than the other groups. In a model controlling for standard demographic and health status variables, higher overall satisfaction with the visit was positively related to higher income and higher mental health functional status. The insurance category variable had no significant relationship to overall satisfaction with the visit. Although patients receiving care through health insurance programs for low-income individuals are generally satisfied with the services, there is an indication that low-income individuals, regardless of insurance type, are less satisfied with the care they receive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10555926     DOI: 10.1023/a:1018786320806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  17 in total

1.  Member ratings of health care provided by 48 physician groups.

Authors:  R D Hays; J A Brown; K L Spritzer; W J Dixon; R H Brook
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1998-04-13

2.  Patient and physician satisfaction with an outpatient care visit.

Authors:  J C Probst; D L Greenhouse; A W Selassie
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 0.493

3.  Respect: its meaning and measurement as an element of patient care.

Authors:  N M Morris
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.222

4.  Methods for measuring patient satisfaction with specific medical encounters.

Authors:  J E Ware; R D Hays
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Insurance type and satisfaction with medical care among HIV-infected men.

Authors:  M H Katz; R Marx; J M Douglas; G A Bolan; M S Park; R J Gurley; S P Buchbinder
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol       Date:  1997-01-01

6.  The relationship between patient income and physician discussion of health risk behaviors.

Authors:  D A Taira; D G Safran; T B Seto; W H Rogers; A R Tarlov
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-11-05       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Physician response to patient insurance status in ambulatory care clinical decision-making. Implications for quality of care.

Authors:  E A Mort; J N Edwards; D W Emmons; K Convery; D Blumenthal
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  The impact of social factors on the content of care. Treatment of ischemic heart disease at a public and a voluntary hospital.

Authors:  M J Yedidia
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1992-03

9.  A causal model of health status and satisfaction with medical care.

Authors:  J A Hall; M A Milburn; A M Epstein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Differences in treatment of ischemic heart disease at a public and a voluntary hospital: sources and consequences.

Authors:  M J Yedidia
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.911

View more
  7 in total

1.  Socioeconomic status and dissatisfaction with health care among chronically ill African Americans.

Authors:  Gay Becker; Edwina Newsom
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Do commercial managed care members rate their health plans differently than Medicaid managed care members?

Authors:  Patrick J Roohan; Scott J Franko; Joseph P Anarella; Laura K Dellehunt; Foster C Gesten
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Differences in trends of perceived inpatient care quality based on regional socioeconomic level in the United States and Taiwan.

Authors:  Grace H Yoon; Shou-Hsia Cheng
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Satisfaction with healthcare services among free clinic patients.

Authors:  Akiko Kamimura; Jeanie Ashby; Kyl Myers; Maziar M Nourian; Nancy Christensen
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2015-02

5.  Racial and ethnic disparities in the quality of diabetes care in a nationally representative sample.

Authors:  Patrick Richard; Pierre Kébreau Alexandre; Anthony Lara; Adaeze B Akamigbo
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 2.830

6.  Disparities in physician-patient communication by obesity status.

Authors:  Patrick Richard; Christine Ferguson; Anthony S Lara; Jennifer Leonard; Mustafa Younis
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 1.730

7.  Inpatients satisfaction with nursing services at king khalid university hospital, riyadh, saudi arabia.

Authors:  A H Al-Doghaither
Journal:  J Family Community Med       Date:  2000-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.