Literature DB >> 11566283

Gender and patient satisfaction in managed care plans: analysis of the 1999 HEDIS/CAHPS 2.0H Adult Survey.

C S Weisman1, J T Henderson, E Schifrin, M Romans, C M Clancy.   

Abstract

This paper investigates gender differences in satisfaction, and in the variables associated with satisfaction, using the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) adult questionnaire administered by the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) as part of HEDIS 1999. Data represent 97,873 men and women enrolled in 206 commercial managed care plans nationwide. Mean plan-level gender differences in satisfaction measures are small, with no consistent pattern of one gender being more satisfied than the other. Controlling for health plan, member, utilization, and selected HEDIS performance indicators, health plan characteristics account for the largest proportion of variance explained in satisfaction. Not-for-profit status and lower turnover of primary care providers are stronger determinants of women's than men's satisfaction. We conclude that it can be useful to analyze CAHPS scores by gender to identify areas for quality improvement in women's health care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11566283     DOI: 10.1016/s1049-3867(01)00093-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Womens Health Issues        ISSN: 1049-3867


  8 in total

1.  Patient satisfaction of female and male users of Veterans Health Administration services.

Authors:  Steven M Wright; Thomas Craig; Stacey Campbell; Jim Schaefer; Charles Humble
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Do commercial managed care members rate their health plans differently than Medicaid managed care members?

Authors:  Patrick J Roohan; Scott J Franko; Joseph P Anarella; Laura K Dellehunt; Foster C Gesten
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Trust, medication adherence, and hypertension control in Southern African American men.

Authors:  Keith Elder; Zo Ramamonjiarivelo; Jacqueline Wiltshire; Crystal Piper; Wendy S Horn; Keon L Gilbert; Sandral Hullett; Jeroan Allison
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Gender-related needs and preferences in cancer care indicate the need for an individualized approach to cancer patients.

Authors:  Hester Wessels; Alexander de Graeff; Klaske Wynia; Miriam de Heus; Cas L J J Kruitwagen; Gerda T G J Woltjer; Saskia C C M Teunissen; Emile E Voest
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-05-27

5.  Gender differences in patients' perceptions of inpatient care.

Authors:  Marc N Elliott; William G Lehrman; Megan K Beckett; Elizabeth Goldstein; Katrin Hambarsoomian; Laura A Giordano
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Quality of breast cancer care: perception versus practice.

Authors:  Nina A Bickell; Jennifer Neuman; Kezhen Fei; Rebeca Franco; Kathie-Ann Joseph
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Race/ethnicity and patient satisfaction. Using the appropriate method to test for perceived differences in care.

Authors:  Donald A Barr
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Factors associated with patients' satisfaction in Brazilian dental primary health care.

Authors:  Muath Abdullah Aldosari; Mary Angela Tavares; Antônio Thomaz Gonzaga Matta-Machado; Mauro Henrique Nogueira Guimarães Abreu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.