Literature DB >> 12968232

A prospective evaluation of hemodynamic instability during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.

Manisha Mishra1, Shipra Shrivastava, Ajay Dhar, Ramesh Bapna, Anil Mishra, Zile Singh Meharwal, Naresh Trehan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite recognized hemodynamic derangements during cardiac displacement, most patients appear to tolerate the off-pump procedure well. However, some patients unpredictably become hemodynamically unstable requiring emergency cardiopulmonary bypass or intra-aortic balloon pump support. After an experience of 5306 multivessel off-pump coronary artery bypasses (OPCABs), this study was undertaken to determine the factors that would identify the patients who were at a higher risk for the procedure.
DESIGN: Prospective clinical investigation.
SETTING: Tertiary care academic cardiac care center. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred consecutive patients undergoing multivessel OPCAB from September to December 2001.
INTERVENTIONS: Various cardiac and extracardiac factors were charted in prespecified data-entry forms. Multiple logistic regression analysis was done to determine if any identifiable factors were predictors of a higher risk of unacceptable hemodynamic instability during OPCAB. Institution of IABP support or conversion to CPB were the endpoints of the study.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 500 patients studied, significant hemodynamic instability developed in 24 (4.8%) patients. IABP support was instituted in 16 (3.2%) patients, and 8 (1.6%) were converted to CPB. Stepwise logistic regression identified ejection fraction <25% (p < 0.001), myocardial infarction of <1-month duration (p = 0.009), congestive heart failure (p = 0.016), and preoperative hemodynamic instability (p = 0.057) as predictors of conversion during OPCAB.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction <25%, myocardial infarction of <1-month duration, congestive heart failure, or preoperative hemodynamic instability constitute the high-risk group for OPCAB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12968232     DOI: 10.1016/s1053-0770(03)00149-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth        ISSN: 1053-0770            Impact factor:   2.628


  6 in total

1.  Early and Medium Outcomes of On-Pump Beating-Heart versus Off-Pump CABG in Patients with Moderate Left Ventricular Dysfunction.

Authors:  Weitie Wang; Yong Wang; Hulin Piao; Bo Li; Tiance Wang; Dan Li; Zhicheng Zhu; Rihao Xu; Kexiang Liu
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb

2.  Risk of renal dysfunction after less invasive multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Soroosh Kiani; Alex K Brown; Dinesh J Kurian; Stanislav Henkin; Mary M Flynn; Nannan Thirumavalavan; Pranjal H Desai; Robert S Poston
Journal:  Innovations (Phila)       Date:  2012 May-Jun

3.  Role of Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis on Intraoperative Conversion and Mortality in Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass.

Authors:  Jeng-Wei Chen; Cheng-Hsin Lin; Ron-Bin Hsu
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.672

4.  Off-pump coronary revascularization: A potential benefit for female patients?

Authors:  Ahmed A Arifi; Erica Huen; J G Franke; Hani Najm
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2009-10

5.  Risk Factors of On-Pump Conversion during Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft.

Authors:  Sung Sil Yoon; Jung Hee Bang; Sang Seok Jeong; Jae Hwa Jeong; Jong Soo Woo
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-10-05

6.  Preoperative right ventricular dysfunction requires high vasoactive and inotropic support during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Tatsuya Kunigo; Yusuke Yoshikawa; Shuji Yamamoto; Michiaki Yamakage
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-01-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.