OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the early and medium outcomes of on-pump beating-heart (OPBH) coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and off-pump CABG (OPCABG) in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between 30% and 40%. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of ischemic heart disease patients with LVEF between 30% and 40% who underwent surgical revascularization from January 2013 to December 2017. Patients were divided into OPBH group (n=44) and OPCABG group (n=68), according to the surgical method. Clinical material with early and medium outcomes were investigated and compared between these groups. RESULTS: The two groups had similar baseline. Two OPBH patients and 3 OPCABG patients died in the hospital, which had no statistical significance (P>0.05). OPBH patients received a greater number of grafts (3.74±0.84) and presented more improved LVEF (45.92±7.11%) than OPCABG patients (3.36±0.80) and (42.81±9.29%), respectively, which had statistical significance (P<0.05). An increased amount of drainage during the first 12 hours was found in the OPBH group (P<0.05). Reoperation for bleeding, duration of mechanic ventilation, and other early outcomes had no statistical significance between the two groups. During the medium-time follow-up, OPBH patients showed significantly lower major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)-free survival time (P=0.049) than OPCABG patients. CONCLUSION: The OPBH technique was a safe and an acceptable alternative for surgical revascularization in patients with moderate left ventricular dysfunction which provided better mid-term MACE-free survival compared with OPCABG.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the early and medium outcomes of on-pump beating-heart (OPBH) coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and off-pump CABG (OPCABG) in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between 30% and 40%. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of ischemic heart diseasepatients with LVEF between 30% and 40% who underwent surgical revascularization from January 2013 to December 2017. Patients were divided into OPBH group (n=44) and OPCABG group (n=68), according to the surgical method. Clinical material with early and medium outcomes were investigated and compared between these groups. RESULTS: The two groups had similar baseline. Two OPBHpatients and 3 OPCABG patients died in the hospital, which had no statistical significance (P>0.05). OPBHpatients received a greater number of grafts (3.74±0.84) and presented more improved LVEF (45.92±7.11%) than OPCABG patients (3.36±0.80) and (42.81±9.29%), respectively, which had statistical significance (P<0.05). An increased amount of drainage during the first 12 hours was found in the OPBH group (P<0.05). Reoperation for bleeding, duration of mechanic ventilation, and other early outcomes had no statistical significance between the two groups. During the medium-time follow-up, OPBHpatients showed significantly lower major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)-free survival time (P=0.049) than OPCABG patients. CONCLUSION: The OPBH technique was a safe and an acceptable alternative for surgical revascularization in patients with moderate left ventricular dysfunction which provided better mid-term MACE-free survival compared with OPCABG.
Authors: P Soltoski; T Salerno; L Levinsky; S Schmid; S Hasnain; T Diesfeld; C Huang; M Akhter; O Alnoweiser; J Bergsland Journal: J Card Surg Date: 1998 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.620
Authors: Michel Carrier; Louis P Perrault; Hugues Jeanmart; Raymond Martineau; Raymond Cartier; Pierre Pagé Journal: Heart Surg Forum Date: 2003 Impact factor: 0.676
Authors: Brent Keeling; Vinod Thourani; Gorav Aliawadi; Sunghee Kim; Derek Cyr; Vinay Badhwar; Jeff P Jacobs; J Matthew Brennan; James Meza; Roland Matsouaka; Michael E Halkos Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2017-06-11 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: A Laurie Shroyer; Frederick L Grover; Brack Hattler; Joseph F Collins; Gerald O McDonald; Elizabeth Kozora; John C Lucke; Janet H Baltz; Dimitri Novitzky Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-11-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Umberto Benedetto; Mario Gaudino; Antonino Di Franco; Massimo Caputo; Lucas B Ohmes; Juan Grau; David Glineur; Leonard N Girardi; Gianni D Angelini Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2018-01-28 Impact factor: 4.164