Literature DB >> 12958682

The laparoscopic experience of surgical graduates in the United States.

R Chung1, Q Pham, L Wojtasik, V Chari, P Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopic surgery has become widespread during the past decade, no systematic study of the training needs exists. To obtain guidance for planning, we analyzed the national resident operative experience during the past 8 years.
METHODS: The laparoscopic experiences of all surgical residents graduating between 1994 and 2001 were subjected to regression analysis. The laparoscopic volume of each trainee and change in ratio of laparoscopic/open operation over time were used to estimate the growth of individual laparoscopic operations in training programs.
RESULTS: Laparoscopic surgery constituted only 5.7% of a trainee's total surgical experience in 1994, but comprised 13% by 2001. A resident completing training in 1994 performed 53 laparoscopic operations, of which 79% (42) were cholecystectomies. By 2001, a graduate performed 126 laparoscopic operations, of which 68% (86) were cholecystectomies. During the interim, most laparoscopic operations exhibited growth. Trainee experience in some newer operations has also increased steadily but at a much slower rate.
CONCLUSIONS: This descriptive statistical survey of training experience yields a comprehensive picture of the laparoscopic capability of the young surgeon. The growth potential of some newer operations has also been measured. Using these data, guidelines can be drawn as to which operation programs should focus resources on training residents. Since competence depends on exposure, residency training alone may not provide sufficient depth to allow recent graduates to perform the newer operations independently.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12958682     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-8922-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  10 in total

1.  Minimally invasive surgical training solutions for the twenty-first century.

Authors:  J C Rosser; M Murayama; N H Gabriel
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  The need for training opportunities in advanced laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  D W Rattner; K N Apelgren; W S Eubanks
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Residency training in advanced laparoscopic surgery: how are we doing?

Authors:  M A Liberman; K Greason
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.719

4.  Laparoscopic training: results of a Belgian survey in trainees. Belgian Group for Endoscopic Surgery (BGES).

Authors:  B Navez; F Penninckx
Journal:  Acta Chir Belg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.090

5.  Integrating advanced laparoscopy into surgical residency training. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

Authors: 
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Surgical rates and operative mortality for open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Maryland.

Authors:  C A Steiner; E B Bass; M A Talamini; H A Pitt; E P Steinberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-02-10       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A statewide experience. The Connecticut Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Registry.

Authors:  R Orlando; J C Russell; J Lynch; A Mattie
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1993-05

8.  Framework for post-residency surgical education and training. The Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons.

Authors: 
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Growing use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the national Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study: effects on volume, patient selection, and selected outcomes.

Authors:  A Y Chen; J Daley; T N Pappas; W G Henderson; S F Khuri
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Falling cholecystectomy thresholds since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J J Escarce; W Chen; J S Schwartz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995 May 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

  10 in total
  13 in total

1.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after a quarter century: why do we still convert?

Authors:  Balazs I Lengyel; Dan Azagury; Oliver Varban; Maria T Panizales; Jill Steinberg; David C Brooks; Stanley W Ashley; Ali Tavakkolizadeh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Development and evaluation of a laparoscopic common bile duct exploration simulator and procedural rating scale.

Authors:  Byron F Santos; Taylor J Reif; Nathaniel J Soper; Alexander P Nagle; Deborah M Rooney; Eric S Hungness
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  What do residents need to be competent laparoscopic and endoscopic surgeons?

Authors:  Aimee K Gardner; Ross E Willis; Brian J Dunkin; Kent R Van Sickle; Kimberly M Brown; Michael S Truitt; John M Uecker; Lonnie Gentry; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  General surgery as education, not specialization.

Authors:  Laureano Fernández-Cruz
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Bringing order to the chaos: developing a matching process for minimally invasive and gastrointestinal postgraduate fellowships.

Authors:  Lee L Swanstrom; Adrian Park; Marty Arregui; Morris Franklin; C Daniel Smith; Christina Blaney
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Minimally invasive surgery fellows would perform a wider variety of cases in their "ideal" fellowship.

Authors:  D S Tichansky; R J Taddeucci; J Harper; A K Madan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  New dog, new tricks: trends in performance on the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery simulator for incoming surgery residents.

Authors:  Nicoleta O Kolozsvari; Pepa Kaneva; Melina C Vassiliou; Gerald M Fried; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy poses physical injury risk to surgeons: analysis of hand technique and standing position.

Authors:  Yassar Youssef; Gyusung Lee; Carlos Godinez; Erica Sutton; Rosemary V Klein; Ivan M George; F Jacob Seagull; Adrian Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Impact of an enhanced recovery program on short-term outcomes after scheduled laparoscopic colon resection.

Authors:  Nicoleta O Kolozsvari; Giovanni Capretti; Pepa Kaneva; Amy Neville; Franco Carli; Sender Liberman; Patrick Charlebois; Barry Stein; Melina C Vassiliou; Gerald M Fried; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: What is the price of conversion?

Authors:  Balazs I Lengyel; Maria T Panizales; Jill Steinberg; Stanley W Ashley; Ali Tavakkoli
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 3.982

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.