Literature DB >> 9445105

Growing use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the national Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study: effects on volume, patient selection, and selected outcomes.

A Y Chen1, J Daley, T N Pappas, W G Henderson, S F Khuri.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to the 43 tertiary-care university-affiliated Veterans Administration medical centers (VAMCs) participating in the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study from October 1991 through December 1993. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies in the private sector have documented growth in the number of cholecystectomies and falling clinical thresholds for cholecystectomy with the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
METHODS: The following were analyzed for changes over time: measures of patient preoperative risk, complexity of surgery, severity of biliary disease, numbers of procedures, postoperative length of stay, and 30-day postoperative mortality and general complication rates.
RESULTS: The number of cholecystectomies performed laparoscopically increased, but the total number of cholecystectomies performed remained stable over time. The proportion of patients with acute cholecystitis, emergent cholecystectomies, and technically complex cholecystectomies did not change or increased slightly over time. Adjusted odds for postoperative general complications were lower for laparoscopic than for open cholecystectomy, but 30-day postoperative mortality and general complication rates for all cholecystectomies remained constant over time. Postoperative length of stay for all cholecystectomies fell significantly. Implementation rates of laparoscopic cholecystectomy varied widely between hospitals. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was adopted more slowly and used in a lower percentage of cholecystectomies than in non-VA settings.
CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to non-VA studies showing increases in overall cholecystectomy volume since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, these VAMCs implemented laparoscopic cholecystectomy without growth in cholecystectomies or a change in the clinical threshold for cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was associated with better outcomes, but its introduction in the setting of stable cholecystectomy volume and biliary disease case mix did not change postoperative mortality and complication rates. The stable cholecystectomy volume and biliary disease case mix, slower adoption, and lower use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy contrast with previous reports and may result from differences in patients and organization and financing of VA versus non-VA settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9445105      PMCID: PMC1191167          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199801000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  27 in total

1.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the evolution of general surgery.

Authors:  J V White
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-10-15       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Interruption of professional and home activity after laparoscopic cholecystectomy among French and American patients.

Authors:  G C Vitale; D Collet; G M Larson; W G Cheadle; F B Miller; J Perissat
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: gateway to the future.

Authors:  J Perissat; G C Vitale
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Future surgery: minimal invasion.

Authors:  M F Goldsmith
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-12-05       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

Review 6.  Managing professional work: three models of control for health organizations.

Authors:  W R Scott
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Medical technology and professional dominance theory.

Authors:  A L Greer
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Multipractice analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1,983 patients.

Authors:  G M Larson; G C Vitale; J Casey; J S Evans; G Gilliam; L Heuser; G McGee; M Rao; M J Scherm; C R Voyles
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Symptomatic biliary tract disease in the elderly patient.

Authors:  J K Harness; W E Strodel; S E Talsma
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 0.688

10.  The National Veterans Administration Surgical Risk Study: risk adjustment for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care.

Authors:  S F Khuri; J Daley; W Henderson; G Barbour; P Lowry; G Irvin; J Gibbs; F Grover; K Hammermeister; J F Stremple
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 6.113

View more
  14 in total

1.  Relation of surgical volume to outcome in eight common operations: results from the VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  S F Khuri; J Daley; W Henderson; K Hur; M Hossain; D Soybel; K W Kizer; J B Aust; R H Bell; V Chong; J Demakis; P J Fabri; J O Gibbs; F Grover; K Hammermeister; G McDonald; E Passaro; L Phillips; F Scamman; J Spencer; J F Stremple
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Biliary tract surgery.

Authors:  S A Ahrendt
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  1999-04

3.  The laparoscopic experience of surgical graduates in the United States.

Authors:  R Chung; Q Pham; L Wojtasik; V Chari; P Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Lymphatic invasion: an important prognostic factor for stages T1b-T3 gallbladder cancer and an indication for additional radical resection of incidental gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Kohei Shibata; Hiroki Uchida; Kentaro Iwaki; Seiichiro Kai; Masayuki Ohta; Seigo Kitano
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  S F Khuri; J Daley; W Henderson; K Hur; J Demakis; J B Aust; V Chong; P J Fabri; J O Gibbs; F Grover; K Hammermeister; G Irvin; G McDonald; E Passaro; L Phillips; F Scamman; J Spencer; J F Stremple
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease in Veteran patients.

Authors:  Zoe Tao; Valerie-Sue Emuakhagbon; Thai Pham; M Mathew Augustine; Angela Guzzetta; Sergio Huerta
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-01-05

7.  Abdominal wall lift versus positive-pressure capnoperitoneum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Afshin Alijani; George B Hanna; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Standardization of surgeon-controlled variables: impact on outcome in patients with acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  J A Greenwald; H F McMullen; G F Coppa; R M Newman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Diagnostic stringency and healthcare needs in patients with biliary dyskinesia.

Authors:  Nitin Aggarwal; Klaus Bielefeldt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-08-11       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  The efficacy of laparoscopy in acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  F Chahin; N Elias; A Paramesh; A Saba; V Godziachvili; Y J Silva
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1999 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.