Literature DB >> 12958321

Cost-effective outcome for treating poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Martin J Wilby1, Melanie Sharp, Peter C Whitfield, Peter J Hutchinson, David K Menon, Peter J Kirkpatrick.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to prospectively assess outcome and cost for poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage patients presenting to a regional neurosurgical center (Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK) between 1994 and 2001. Outcome measures were clinical outcome at 6 months, number needed to treat (NNT) for favorable outcomes, and cost analysis.
METHODS: Poor-grade patients (World Federation of Neurological Surgeons grades 4 and 5) were transferred to the neurocritical care unit after intubation and ventilation. After resuscitation and drainage of ventricular cerebrospinal fluid for 24 hours, sedation was stopped, and patients were assessed clinically. Patients with a Glasgow Motor Score (GMS) > or =4 underwent angiography and surgical treatment of culprit aneurysms. Patients with a subsequent GMS of 6 were not deemed poor grade and were discounted from the study.
RESULTS: We deemed 166 ventilated patients genuinely poor grade (mean age, 53.4 years; 94 women [56.6%]). Of these, 88 patients (4<GMS<6; 53%) progressed to angiography and possible definitive treatment. Seventy-five patients had an identifiable aneurysm, but only 64 survived for treatment. Operative mortality was 31.3%, and of the 44 survivors, 22 (34.4% of operated patients) achieved a favorable outcome. Favorable outcomes were more frequently seen in women than men (21.3% versus 6.9%) but were unrelated to patient age. The NNT for 1 favorable outcome was 7 (male NNT, 15; female NNT, 5) at a cost of pound 84 336 per favorable outcome (female, pound 60 240; male, pound 180 720).
CONCLUSIONS: Poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is associated with a high mortality but a significant subset of patients can achieve favorable outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12958321     DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000089922.94684.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  13 in total

1.  Time course of outcome in poor grade subarachnoid hemorrhage patients: a longitudinal retrospective study.

Authors:  Elisa Gouvêa Bogossian; Daniela Diaferia; Andrea Minini; Narcisse Ndieugnou Djangang; Marco Menozzi; Lorenzo Peluso; Filippo Annoni; Jacques Creteur; Sophie Schuind; Olivier Dewitte; Fabio Silvio Taccone
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.474

Review 2.  The critical care research networks experience.

Authors:  P D Le Roux; J Cooper; K K Guntupalli; R Silbergleit; J Daily; R Geocadin; C A C Wijman; J I Suarez
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.210

3.  Burden of disease and costs of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Oliver Rivero-Arias; Alastair Gray; Jane Wolstenholme
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2010-04-27

4.  Comparative evaluation of H&H and WFNS grading scales with modified H&H (sans systemic disease): A study on 1000 patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Ashish Aggarwal; Sivashanmugam Dhandapani; Kokkula Praneeth; Harsimrat Bir Singh Sodhi; Sudhir Singh Pal; Sachin Gaudihalli; N Khandelwal; Kanchan K Mukherjee; M K Tewari; Sunil Kumar Gupta; S N Mathuriya
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 5.  Update on subarachnoid haemorrhage.

Authors:  José M Ferro; P Canhão; R Peralta
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 6.  Functional Outcome After Poor-Grade Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Single-Center Study and Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Airton Leonardo de Oliveira Manoel; Ann Mansur; Gisele Sampaio Silva; Menno R Germans; Blessing N R Jaja; Ekaterina Kouzmina; Thomas R Marotta; Simon Abrahamson; Tom A Schweizer; Julian Spears; R Loch Macdonald
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  Predictors of 1-year outcome after coiling for poor-grade subarachnoid aneurysmal hemorrhage.

Authors:  Ana R Pereira; Paola Sanchez-Peña; Alessandra Biondi; Nader Sourour; Anne L Boch; Chantal Colonne; Lise Lejean; Lamine Abdennour; Louis Puybasset
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.210

8.  Effects of hyper-early (<12 hours) endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms on clinical outcome.

Authors:  A Consoli; G Grazzini; L Renieri; A Rosi; A De Renzis; C Vignoli; S Nappini; F Ammannati; L Capaccioli; S Mangiafico
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 1.610

9.  Clinical Trial Protocol: Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Efficacy, and Safety Study Comparing EG-1962 to Standard of Care Oral Nimodipine in Adults with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage [NEWTON-2 (Nimodipine Microparticles to Enhance Recovery While Reducing TOxicity After SubarachNoid Hemorrhage)].

Authors:  Daniel Hänggi; Nima Etminan; Stephan A Mayer; E Francois Aldrich; Michael N Diringer; Erich Schmutzhard; Herbert J Faleck; David Ng; Benjamin R Saville; R Loch Macdonald
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 10.  Incidence, predisposing factors, management and survival following cardiac arrest due to subarachnoid haemorrhage: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Markus B Skrifvars; Michael J Parr
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.