Literature DB >> 17657653

Predictors of 1-year outcome after coiling for poor-grade subarachnoid aneurysmal hemorrhage.

Ana R Pereira1, Paola Sanchez-Peña, Alessandra Biondi, Nader Sourour, Anne L Boch, Chantal Colonne, Lise Lejean, Lamine Abdennour, Louis Puybasset.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe features in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and to identify predictors of 12-month outcome.
METHODS: We conducted a controlled observational study of 51 consecutive patients treated with endovascular coiling within 96 h of rupture for poor-grade aneurysmal SAH (20 men and 31 women, age 54 +/- 12 years). We recorded co-morbidities; initial severity; aneurysm location; occurrence of acute hydrocephalus, initial seizures, and/or neurogenic lung edema; troponin values, Fisher grade; computed tomography (CT) findings; treatment intensity; and occurrence of vasospasm. The brain injury marker S100B was assayed daily over the first 8 days. Glasgow Outcome Scores (GOS) were recorded at ICU discharge, at 6 and 12 months. The main outcome criterion was the 1-year GOS score, which we used to classify patients as having a poor outcome (GOS 1-3) or a good outcome (GOS 4-5).
RESULTS: Overall, clinical status after 1 year was very good (GOS 5) in 41% of patients and good (GOS 4) in 16%. Neither baseline characteristics nor interventions differed significantly between patients with good outcome (GOS 4-5) and those with poor outcome (GOS 1-3). Persistent intracranial pressure elevation and higher mean 8-day S100B value significantly and independently predicted the 1-year GOS outcome (P = 0.008 and P = 0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients in poor clinical condition after SAH have more than a 50:50 chance of a favorable outcome after 1 year. High mean 8-day S100B value and persistent intracranial hypertension predict a poor outcome (GOS 1-3) after 1 year.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17657653     DOI: 10.1007/s12028-007-0053-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurocrit Care        ISSN: 1541-6933            Impact factor:   3.210


  36 in total

1.  Ruptured intracranial aneurysms: acute endovascular treatment with electrolytically detachable coils--a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  R Vanninen; T Koivisto; T Saari; J Hernesniemi; M Vapalahti
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  W E Hunt; R M Hess
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Comparison of transcranial Doppler investigation of aneurysmal vasospasm with digital subtraction angiographic and clinical findings.

Authors:  Y Okada; T Shima; M Nishida; K Yamane; T Hatayama; C Yamanaka; A Yoshida
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Extracellular fluid S100B in the injured brain: a future surrogate marker of acute brain injury?

Authors:  J Sen; A Belli; A Petzold; S Russo; G Keir; E J Thompson; M Smith; N Kitchen
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2005-04-25       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  Epidemiology of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in Australia and New Zealand: incidence and case fatality from the Australasian Cooperative Research on Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Study (ACROSS).

Authors: 
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Intracranial pressure following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: monitoring practices and outcome data.

Authors:  William J Mack; Ryan G King; Andrew F Ducruet; Kurt Kreiter; J Mocco; Ahmed Maghoub; Stephan Mayer; E Sander Connolly
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 7.  Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.

Authors:  I van der Schaaf; A Algra; M Wermer; A Molyneux; M Clarke; J van Gijn; G Rinkel
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-10-19

8.  Clinical outcome after endovascular coil embolization in elderly patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  M Johansson; O Norbäck; G Gál; K G Cesarini; M Tovi; S Solander; C F Contant; E Ronne-Engström; P Enblad
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2004-04-17       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Endovascular management of poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in the geriatric population.

Authors:  Rajan Jain; John Deveikis; Byron Gregory Thompson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Contribution of raised ICP and hypotension to CPP reduction in severe brain injury: correlation to outcome.

Authors:  A Marmarou; A Saad; G Aygok; M Rigsbee
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  2005
View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  High-volume centers.

Authors:  P Vespa; Michael N Diringer
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  Outcome in poor grade subarachnoid hemorrhage patients treated with acute endovascular coiling of aneurysms and aggressive intensive care.

Authors:  Christopher J Taylor; Fergus Robertson; David Brealey; Frankie O'shea; Tina Stephen; Stefan Brew; Joan P Grieve; Martin Smith; Ian Appleby
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 3.  The importance of early brain injury after subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Fatima A Sehba; Jack Hou; Ryszard M Pluta; John H Zhang
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 11.685

4.  Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Induces Gliosis and Increased Expression of the Pro-inflammatory Cytokine High Mobility Group Box 1 Protein.

Authors:  Kentaro Murakami; Masayo Koide; Travis M Dumont; Sheila R Russell; Bruce I Tranmer; George C Wellman
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 6.829

5.  A multiparameter panel method for outcome prediction following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Natacha Turck; Laszlo Vutskits; Paola Sanchez-Pena; Xavier Robin; Alexandre Hainard; Marianne Gex-Fabry; Catherine Fouda; Hadiji Bassem; Markus Mueller; Frédérique Lisacek; Louis Puybasset; Jean-Charles Sanchez
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Treatment of poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage trial.

Authors:  D Mitra; B Gregson; V Jayakrishnan; A Gholkar; A Vincent; P White; P Mitchell
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Factors and outcomes associated with ultra-early surgery for poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a multicentre retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Bing Zhao; Yuanli Zhao; Xianxi Tan; Yong Cao; Jun Wu; Ming Zhong; Shuo Wang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  Association between S100B Levels and Long-Term Outcome after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis.

Authors:  Pui Man Rosalind Lai; Rose Du
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A Multicenter prospective study of poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (AMPAS): observational registry study.

Authors:  Bing Zhao; Xianxi Tan; Hua Yang; Kuang Zheng; Zequn Li; Ye Xiong; Ming Zhong
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 2.474

10.  Early and persistent high level of PS 100β is associated with increased poor neurological outcome in patients with SAH: is there a PS 100β threshold for SAH prognosis?

Authors:  Hervé Quintard; Sébastien Leduc; Patricia Ferrari; Isabelle Petit; Carole Ichai
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.