| Literature DB >> 25163674 |
Talwinder Kaur, Arti Vasudev, Satwinder Kaur Sohal, Rajesh Kumari Manhas1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Destructive impacts of insecticides on non targeted populations necessitate the development of an eco friendly pest control method. Streptomyces spp. are rich source of bioactive secondary metabolites which may provide valuable alternatives to chemical insect-control agents as they can be less toxic and readily biodegradable. Because of its potent biocontrol attributes, ethyl acetate extract of Streptomyces hydrogenans DH16, a soil isolate, was tested to assess its anti-insect potential against polyphagous noctuid, Spodoptera litura.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25163674 PMCID: PMC4154520 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-014-0227-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Influence of ethyl acetate extract of on and azadirachtin on various developmental parameters of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 400 | 17.30 ± 0.19ab | 10.36 ± 0.40ab | 27.66 ± 0.40 |
| 800 | 19.97 ± 2.15ab | 8.03 ± 0.76b | 28.00 ± 0.93 | |
| 1600 | 22.00 ± 2.11b | - | - | |
| f- value | 3.30* | 5.83** | 0.62N.S | |
| R2 | 0.99 | 0.82 | 0.57 | |
| Azadirachtin | 400 | 16.66 ± 0.33c | 7.00 ± 0.36c | - |
| 800 | - | - | - | |
| 1600 | - | - | - | |
| f- value | - | - | - | |
| R2 | - | - | - |
Mean ± SE followed by different letters (superscript) with in a column are significantly different. Tukey’s test P ≤ 0.05, N.S = Non Significant, R2 = Coefficient of determination, *Significant at 5% level, **Significant at 1% level.
Regression equation, lower as well as upper 95% confidence limits for LC and LC
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 1164.962a | 1562.021a | 1337.384 | 2070.516 | |
| Y = 6.751X-16.107 | 1729.403b | 2989.165b | |||
| 32.516c | 363.252c | 260.121 | 560.390 | ||
| Azadirachtin | Y = 3.866X-9.344 | 427.265d | 1142.37d | ||
aLower and upper 95% confidence limits for LC50 for Streptomyces ethyl acetate extract, bLower and upper 95% confidence limits for LC90 Streptomyces ethyl acetate extract, cLower and upper 95% confidence limits for LC50 for azadirachtin, dLower and upper 95% confidence limits for LC90 for azadirachtin.
Effect of ethyl acetate extract of and azadirachtin on mortality rate of different developmental stages of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | - | - | 13.80 ± 0.67a | - | |
|
| 400 | - | - | 48.26 ± 1.01b | 39.98 ± 1.40a |
| 800 | 20.00 ± 00.00a | 20.00 ± 4.47a | 57.13 ± 2.09c | 50.26 ± 0.45b | |
| 1600 | 70.00 ± 12.40b | 66.66 ± 0.38b | 100.00 ± 00d | 100.00 ± 0.00c | |
| f- value | 16.30** | 107.79** | 863.97** | 1436.26** | |
| R2 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.94 | 0.94 | |
| Azadirachtin | 400 | 76.66 ± 1.59c | - | 85.70 ± 1.22e | 83.41 ± 0.45d |
| 800 | 96.66 ± 0.42d | - | - | - | |
| 1600 | 100.00 ± 00e | - | - | - | |
| f- value | 146.19** | - | - | - | |
| R2 | 0.85 | - | - | - |
Mean ± SE followed by different letters with in a column are significantly different. Tukey’s test P ≤ 0.05, R2 = Coefficient of determination, **Significant at 1% level.
Figure 1Effect of ethyl acetate extract of on % age emergence of Columns and bars represent the mean ± SE. Different letters above the columns representing each concentration indicate significant differences at Tukey’s test P ≤ 0.05.
Effect of ethyl acetate extract on longevity, fecundity and percent hatching of adults
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 11.50 ± 0.76a | 1500 ± 151.00a | 87.66 ± 0.91 |
| 400 | 5.00 ± 0.77b | 150.20 ± 22.40b | - |
| 800 | 4.33 ± 0.66b | - | - |
| 1600 | - | - | - |
| f- value | 28.89** | 78.64** | - |
| R2 | 0.91 | 0.67 | 0.60 |
Mean ± SE followed by different letters with in a column are significantly different. Tukey’s test P ≤ 0.05, R2 = Coefficient of determination, **Significant at 1% level.
Figure 2Developmental stages of reared on control diet (a,c,f) and abnormalities in different stages fed on diet supplemented with different concentrations of ethyl acetate extract of S. hydrogenans (b,d,e,g,h).
Effect of ethyl acetate extract of and azadirachtin on food utilization and feeding of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 2.17 ± 0.07a | 6.97 ± 0.39a | 28.35 ± 1.05a | |
|
| 400 | 1.88 ± 0.03ab | 7.29 ± 0.26a | 30.00 ± 0.29a |
| 800 | 1.66 ± 0.10b | 6.99 ± 0.38a | 51.96 ± 0.44b | |
| 1600 | 1.10 ± 0.11c | 3.53 ± 0.29b | 66.00 ± 1.33c | |
| f- value | 26.45** | 27.53** | 416.91** | |
| R2 | 0.95 | 0.59 | 0.92 | |
| Azadirachtin | 400 | 1.54 ± 0.20d | 3.92 ± 0.80c | 43.56 ± 9.37d |
| 800 | - | - | - | |
| 1600 | - | - | - | |
| f- value | - | - | - | |
| R2 | - | - | - |
Mean ± SE followed by different letters with in a column are significantly different. Tukey’s test P ≤ 0.05, R2 = Coefficient of determination, *Significant at 5% level, **Significant at 1% level.
Figure 3Effect of (a) ethyl acetate extract of and (b) Azadirachtin on ECI of . Columns and bars represent the mean ± SE. Different letters above the columns representing each concentration indicate significant differences at Tukey’s test P ≤ 0.05.
Figure 4Effect of (a) ethyl acetate extract of and (b) Azadirachtin on ECD of . Columns and bars represent the mean ± SE. Different letters above the columns representing each concentration indicate significant differences at Tukey’s test P ≤ 0.05.