Literature DB >> 12954681

Cost effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for patients with acute, undifferentiated chest pain.

S Goodacre1, N Calvert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Patients presenting to hospital with acute, undifferentiated chest pain have a low, but important, risk of significant myocardial ischaemia. Potential diagnostic strategies for patients with acute, undifferentiated chest pain vary from low cost, poor effectiveness (discharging all home) to high cost, high effectiveness (admission and intensive investigation). This paper aimed to estimate the relative cost effectiveness of these strategies.
METHODS: Decision analysis modelling was used to measure the incremental cost per quality adjusted year of life (QALY) gained for five potential strategies to diagnose acute undifferentiated chest pain, compared with the next most effective strategy, or a baseline strategy of discharging all patients home without further testing.
RESULTS: Cardiac enzyme testing alone costs pound 17 432/QALY compared with discharge without testing. Adding two to six hours of observation and repeat enzyme testing costs an additional pound 18 567/QALY. Adding exercise testing to this strategy costs pound 28 553/QALY. A strategy of overnight admission, enzyme, and exercise testing has an incremental cost of pound 120 369/QALY, while a strategy consisting of overnight admission without exercise testing is subject to extended dominance. Sensitivity analysis revealed that the results are sensitive to variations in the direct costs of running each strategy and to variation in assumptions regarding the effect of diagnostic testing upon quality of life of those with non-cardiac disease.
CONCLUSION: Observation based strategies incur similar costs per QALY to presently funded interventions for coronary heart disease, while strategies requiring hospital admission may be prohibitively poor value for money. Validation of the true costs and effects of observation based strategies is essential before widespread implementation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12954681      PMCID: PMC1726206          DOI: 10.1136/emj.20.5.429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  27 in total

1.  "Chest pain-please admit": is there an alternative?. A rapid cardiological assessment service may prevent unnecessary admissions.

Authors:  S Capewell; J McMurray
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-08

2.  A prospective, observational study of a chest pain observation unit in a British hospital.

Authors:  S W Goodacre; F M Morris; S Campbell; J Arnold; K Angelini
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Is a chest pain observation unit likely to be cost saving in a British hospital?

Authors:  S Goodacre; F Morris; J Arnold; K Angelini
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department.

Authors:  J H Pope; T P Aufderheide; R Ruthazer; R H Woolard; J A Feldman; J R Beshansky; J L Griffith; H P Selker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-04-20       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Clinical characteristics and natural history of patients with acute myocardial infarction sent home from the emergency room.

Authors:  T H Lee; G W Rouan; M C Weisberg; D A Brand; D Acampora; C Stasiulewicz; J Walshon; G Terranova; L Gottlieb; B Goldstein-Wayne
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1987-08-01       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 6.  Optimal treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  H D White
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Psychologic morbidity and health-related quality of life of patients assessed in a chest pain observation unit.

Authors:  S Goodacre; S Mason; J Arnold; K Angelini
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.721

8.  Usefulness of hospital admission risk stratification for predicting nonfatal acute myocardial infarction or death six months later in unstable angina pectoris. RESCATE Study Group. Resources Used in Acute Coronary Syndromes and Delays in Treatment.

Authors:  L Serés; V Valle; J Marrugat; G Sanz; R Masiá; J Lupón; A Curós; J Sala; L Molina; M Pavesi
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Is it possible to exclude a diagnosis of myocardial damage within six hours of admission to an emergency department? Diagnostic cohort study.

Authors:  K R Herren; K Mackway-Jones; C R Richards; C J Seneviratne; M W France; L Cotter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-08-18

10.  A predictive instrument to improve coronary-care-unit admission practices in acute ischemic heart disease. A prospective multicenter clinical trial.

Authors:  M W Pozen; R B D'Agostino; H P Selker; P A Sytkowski; W B Hood
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-05-17       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  9 in total

1.  The potential role for the use of cardiac computed tomography angiography for the acute chest pain patient in the emergency department.

Authors:  Sean R Wilson; James K Min
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Is a chest pain observation unit likely to be cost effective at my hospital? Extrapolation of data from a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  S Goodacre; S Dixon
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Low-risk patients with chest pain in the emergency department: negative 64-MDCT coronary angiography may reduce length of stay and hospital charges.

Authors:  Janet M May; William P Shuman; Jared N Strote; Kelley R Branch; Lee M Mitsumori; David W Lockhart; James H Caldwell
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Direct hospital costs of chest pain patients attending the emergency department: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Jakob L Forberg; Louise S Henriksen; Lars Edenbrandt; Ulf Ekelund
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2006-05-04

Review 5.  Risk stratification in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: Risk scores, biomarkers and clinical judgment.

Authors:  David Corcoran; Patrick Grant; Colin Berry
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2015-09-01

6.  Specific Pharmacological Profile of A2A Adenosine Receptor Predicts Reduced Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Franck Paganelli; Noémie Resseguier; Marion Marlinge; Marc Laine; Fabrice Malergue; Nathalie Kipson; Pauline Armangau; Nicolas Pezzoli; Francois Kerbaul; Laurent Bonello; Giovanna Mottola; Emmanuel Fenouillet; Régis Guieu; Jean Ruf
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  A randomised controlled trial to measure the effect of chest pain unit care upon anxiety, depression, and health-related quality of life [ISRCTN85078221].

Authors:  Steve Goodacre; Jon Nicholl
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  Cost effectiveness of chest pain unit care in the NHS.

Authors:  Yemi Oluboyede; Steve Goodacre; Allan Wailoo
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Societal costs of non-cardiac chest pain compared with ischemic heart disease--a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Ghassan Mourad; Jenny Alwin; Anna Strömberg; Tiny Jaarsma
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 2.655

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.