Literature DB >> 19542407

Low-risk patients with chest pain in the emergency department: negative 64-MDCT coronary angiography may reduce length of stay and hospital charges.

Janet M May1, William P Shuman, Jared N Strote, Kelley R Branch, Lee M Mitsumori, David W Lockhart, James H Caldwell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The current standard-of-care workup of low-risk patients with chest pain in an emergency department takes 12-36 hours and is expensive. We hypothesized that negative 64-MDCT coronary angiography early in the workup of such patients may enable a shorter length of stay and reduce charges.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The standard-of-care evaluation consisted of serial cardiac enzyme tests, ECGs, and stress testing. After informed consent, we added cardiac CT early in the standard-of-care workup of 53 consecutive patients. Fifty patients had negative CT findings and were included in this series. The length of stay and charges were analyzed using actual patient data for all patients in the standard-of-care workup and for two earlier discharge scenarios based on negative cardiac CT results: First, CT plus serial enzyme tests and ECGs during an observation period followed by discharge if all were negative; and second, CT plus one set of enzyme tests and one ECG followed by discharge if all were negative. Comparisons were made using paired Student's t tests.
RESULTS: For standard of care and the two CT-based earlier discharge analyses, the mean lengths of stay were 25.4, 14.3, and 5.0 hours; mean charges were $7,597, $6,153, and $4,251. Length of stay and charges were both significantly less (p < 0.001) for the two CT-based analyses.
CONCLUSION: In low-risk patients with chest pain, discharge from the emergency department based on negative cardiac CT, enzyme tests, and ECG may significantly decrease both length of stay and hospital charges compared with the standard of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19542407      PMCID: PMC3743664          DOI: 10.2214/AJR.08.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  23 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of the patient with acute chest pain.

Authors:  T H Lee; L Goldman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-04-20       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: A method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making.

Authors:  E M Antman; M Cohen; P J Bernink; C H McCabe; T Horacek; G Papuchis; B Mautner; R Corbalan; D Radley; E Braunwald
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-08-16       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  64 slice cardiovascular CT in the emergency department: concepts and first experiences.

Authors:  G Savino; C Herzog; P Costello; U J Schoepf
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2006-05-29       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Application of the TIMI risk score for unstable angina and non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome to an unselected emergency department chest pain population.

Authors:  Charles V Pollack; Frank D Sites; Frances S Shofer; Keara L Sease; Judd E Hollander
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 3.451

5.  Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department.

Authors:  J H Pope; T P Aufderheide; R Ruthazer; R H Woolard; J A Feldman; J R Beshansky; J L Griffith; H P Selker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-04-20       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography.

Authors:  Gilbert L Raff; Michael J Gallagher; William W O'Neill; James A Goldstein
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Cost-effectiveness of a coronary care unit versus an intermediate care unit for emergency department patients with chest pain.

Authors:  A N Tosteson; L Goldman; I S Udvarhelyi; T H Lee
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  The financial burden of emergency department congestion and hospital crowding for chest pain patients awaiting admission.

Authors:  Matthew D Bayley; J Sanford Schwartz; Frances S Shofer; Mark Weiner; Frank D Sites; K Bobbi Traber; Judd E Hollander
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.721

9.  National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2004 emergency department summary.

Authors:  Linda F McCaig; Eric W Nawar
Journal:  Adv Data       Date:  2006-06-23

10.  Cost effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for patients with acute, undifferentiated chest pain.

Authors:  S Goodacre; N Calvert
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.740

View more
  9 in total

1.  The potential role for the use of cardiac computed tomography angiography for the acute chest pain patient in the emergency department.

Authors:  Sean R Wilson; James K Min
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  The potential role for the use of cardiac computed tomography angiography for the acute chest pain patient in the emergency department: a cautionary viewpoint.

Authors:  Robert Hendel; Naim Dahdah
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Assessment of acute chest pain in the emergency department: Evaluation of the Rule Out Myocardial Infarction Using Computer Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT) trial and its future implications.

Authors:  Seth Kligerman; Charlie White
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  A Heart Rate-Dependent Protocol of "One-Stop" Computed Tomography Angiography of Coronary Combined with Pulmonary Arteries Reduces the Dosages of Contrast Agent.

Authors:  Hairong Yu; Hui Wang; Zhen Gao; Guoyue Chen; Hao Song; Shihao Yan; Xiaomei Luan; Peiji Song
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 2.623

Review 5.  Coronary CT and the coronary calcium score, the future of ED risk stratification?

Authors:  Leticia Fernandez-Friera; Ana Garcia-Alvarez; Gabriela Guzman; Mario J Garcia
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2012-05

Review 6.  Korean guidelines for the appropriate use of cardiac CT.

Authors:  Young Jin Kim; Hwan Seok Yong; Sung Mok Kim; Jeong A Kim; Dong Hyun Yang; Yoo Jin Hong
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Efficacy of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Nuclear Perfusion Stress in Preventing Downstream Imaging and Prolonged Inpatient Length of Stay in Low to Medium Risk Patients With Chest Pain.

Authors:  Mileydis Alonso; Radhika K Neicheril; Shruti Shettigar; Allen Lavina; Yelenis Seijo de Armas; Avery Carter; Hong Liang; Ashley Alonso; Jared S Piotrkowski
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-27

8.  Diagnostic accuracy and clinical outcomes of ECG-gated, whole chest CT in the emergency department.

Authors:  Kelley R Branch; Jared Strote; William P Shuman; Lee M Mitsumori; Janet M Busey; Tessa Rue; James H Caldwell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Short-Term Outcome of Discharged Low-Risk Chest Pain without Provoke Ischemia Study.

Authors:  Anita Sabzghabaei; Setareh Asgarzadeh; Reza Miri; Majid Shojaee; Hossein Alimohammadi; Kamran Heidari
Journal:  Emerg (Tehran)       Date:  2014
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.