Literature DB >> 11509427

Is it possible to exclude a diagnosis of myocardial damage within six hours of admission to an emergency department? Diagnostic cohort study.

K R Herren1, K Mackway-Jones, C R Richards, C J Seneviratne, M W France, L Cotter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical efficacy and accuracy of an emergency department based six hour rule-out protocol for myocardial damage.
DESIGN: Diagnostic cohort study.
SETTING: Emergency department of an inner city university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 383 consecutive patients aged over 25 years with chest pain of less than 12 hours' duration who were at low to moderate risk of acute myocardial infarction. INTERVENTION: Serial measurements of creatine kinase MB mass and continuous ST segment monitoring for six hours with 12 leads. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Performance of the diagnostic test against a gold standard consisting of either a 48 hour measurement of troponin T concentration or screening for myocardial infarction according to the World Health Organization's criteria.
RESULTS: Outcome of the gold standard test was available for 292 patients. On the diagnostic test for the protocol, 53 patients had positive results and 239 patients had negative results. There were 18 false positive results and one false negative result. Sensitivity was 97.2% (95% confidence interval 95.0% to 99.0%), specificity 93.0% (90.0% to 96.0%), the negative predictive value 99.6%, and the positive predictive value 66.0%. The positive likelihood ratio was 13.9 and the negative likelihood ratio 0.03.
CONCLUSIONS: The six hour rule-out protocol for myocardial infarction is accurate and efficacious. It can be used in patients presenting to emergency departments with chest pain indicating a low to moderate risk of myocardial infarction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11509427      PMCID: PMC37396          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.323.7309.372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  21 in total

1.  An audit of doctor's management of patients with chest pain in the accident and emergency department.

Authors:  P A Emerson; N J Russell; J Wyatt; N Crichton; C F Pantin; A D Morgan; P R Fleming
Journal:  Q J Med       Date:  1989-03

2.  Clinical characteristics and natural history of patients with acute myocardial infarction sent home from the emergency room.

Authors:  T H Lee; G W Rouan; M C Weisberg; D A Brand; D Acampora; C Stasiulewicz; J Walshon; G Terranova; L Gottlieb; B Goldstein-Wayne
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1987-08-01       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Continuous ST segment analysis for the detection of perioperative myocardial ischemia.

Authors:  F M Clements; R L McCann; R I Levin
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  D F Ransohoff; A R Feinstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-10-26       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Chest pain evaluation unit: a cost-effective approach for ruling out acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  A C de Leon; C A Farmer; G King; J Manternach; D Ritter
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 0.954

6.  Cardiac troponin T in diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J Mair; E Artner-Dworzak; P Lechleitner; J Smidt; I Wagner; F Dienstl; B Puschendorf
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  Prospective audit of incidence of prognostically important myocardial damage in patients discharged from emergency department.

Authors:  P O Collinson; S Premachandram; K Hashemi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-24

8.  Sensitivity of routine clinical criteria for diagnosing myocardial infarction within 24 hours of hospitalization.

Authors:  T H Lee; G W Rouan; M C Weisberg; D A Brand; E F Cook; D Acampora; L Goldman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Use of the initial electrocardiogram to predict in-hospital complications of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J E Brush; D A Brand; D Acampora; B Chalmer; F J Wackers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-05-02       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Noninvasive detection of coronary artery patency using continuous ST-segment monitoring.

Authors:  M W Krucoff; C E Green; L F Satler; F C Miller; R S Pallas; K M Kent; A A Del Negro; D L Pearle; R D Fletcher; C E Rackley
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1986-04-15       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  12 in total

1.  Diagnosing myocardial infarction. Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a chest pain unit are in progress.

Authors:  S Goodacre; F Morris; S Campbell; D Quinney; S Capewell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-12-08

2.  Chest pain units.

Authors:  Mike Clancy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-07-20

Review 3.  Safe discharge: an irrational, unhelpful and unachievable concept.

Authors:  S Goodacre
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 4.  Clinical decision units in the emergency department: old concepts, new paradigms, and refined gate keeping.

Authors:  T B Hassan
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Development of acute chest pain services in the UK.

Authors:  Elizabeth Cross; Steven How; Steve Goodacre
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Critical pathways for post-emergency outpatient diagnosis and treatment: tools to improve the value of emergency care.

Authors:  Jeremiah D Schuur; Christopher W Baugh; Erik P Hess; Joshua A Hilton; Jesse M Pines; Brent R Asplin
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 7.  Cardiac markers in the low-risk chest pain patient.

Authors:  Scott G Weiner; Shamai A Grossman
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.397

8.  Structure, process and outcomes of chest pain units established in the ESCAPE trial.

Authors:  Jane Arnold; Steve Goodacre; Francis Morris
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Cost effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for patients with acute, undifferentiated chest pain.

Authors:  S Goodacre; N Calvert
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  Which diagnostic tests are most useful in a chest pain unit protocol?

Authors:  Steve Goodacre; Thomas Locker; Jane Arnold; Karen Angelini; Francis Morris
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2005-08-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.