BACKGROUND: The epicardial location of an arrhythmia could be responsible for unsuccessful endocardial catheter ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 48 patients referred after prior unsuccessful endocardial ablation, we considered percutaneous, subxiphoid instrumentation of the pericardial space for mapping and ablation. Thirty patients had ventricular tachycardia (VT), 6 patients had a right- and 4 had a left-sided accessory pathway (AP), 4 patients had inappropriate sinus tachycardia, and 4 patients had atrial arrhythmias. Of the 30 VTs, 24 (6 with ischemic cardiomyopathy, 3 with idiopathic cardiomyopathy, and 15 with normal hearts) appeared to originate from the epicardium. Seventeen (71%) of these 24 VTs were successfully ablated with epicardial lesions. The other 7 VTs had early epicardial sites that were inaccessible, predominantly because of interference from the left atrial appendage. Six of these were successfully ablated from the left coronary cusp. In 5 of the 10 patients with an AP, the earliest activation was recorded epicardially. Three of these were right atrial appendage-to-right ventricle APs, and epicardial ablation was successful. No significant complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Failure of endocardial ablation could reflect the presence of an epicardial arrhythmia substrate. Epicardial instrumentation and ablation appeared feasible and safe and provided an alternative strategy for the treatment of patients with a variety of arrhythmias. This was particularly true for VT, including patients without structural heart disease.
BACKGROUND: The epicardial location of an arrhythmia could be responsible for unsuccessful endocardial catheter ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 48 patients referred after prior unsuccessful endocardial ablation, we considered percutaneous, subxiphoid instrumentation of the pericardial space for mapping and ablation. Thirty patients had ventricular tachycardia (VT), 6 patients had a right- and 4 had a left-sided accessory pathway (AP), 4 patients had inappropriate sinus tachycardia, and 4 patients had atrial arrhythmias. Of the 30 VTs, 24 (6 with ischemic cardiomyopathy, 3 with idiopathic cardiomyopathy, and 15 with normal hearts) appeared to originate from the epicardium. Seventeen (71%) of these 24 VTs were successfully ablated with epicardial lesions. The other 7 VTs had early epicardial sites that were inaccessible, predominantly because of interference from the left atrial appendage. Six of these were successfully ablated from the left coronary cusp. In 5 of the 10 patients with an AP, the earliest activation was recorded epicardially. Three of these were right atrial appendage-to-right ventricle APs, and epicardial ablation was successful. No significant complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Failure of endocardial ablation could reflect the presence of an epicardial arrhythmia substrate. Epicardial instrumentation and ablation appeared feasible and safe and provided an alternative strategy for the treatment of patients with a variety of arrhythmias. This was particularly true for VT, including patients without structural heart disease.
Authors: Tom Wong; Wajid Hussain; Vias Markides; Diana A Gorog; Ian Wright; Nicholas S Peters; D Wyn Davies Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2006-11-18 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Takeyoshi Ota; Amir Degani; David Schwartzman; Brett Zubiate; Jeremy McGarvey; Howie Choset; Marco A Zenati Journal: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Date: 2008