INTRODUCTION: Epicardial ablation is becoming an important part of management in patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT). Posterior epicardial access via the Sosa or needle-in-needle (NIN) approach for epicardial VT ablation is considered to be the method of choice for most electrophysiologists. Anterior epicardial access as an alternative technique has recently been proposed, but there are limited data about its safety, efficacy, and the rate of immediate complications. In this study, we report our experience with anterior epicardial access between 2009 and 2016. METHODS: Between 2009 and June 2016, 100 consecutive patients underwent epicardial VT ablation using an anterior approach. The success rate, epicardial bleeding, and other complications related to the epicardial access in these patients were compared to the previously reported rate of complications in patients whom epicardial access was performed using the NIN or Sosa techniques. RESULTS: Anterior epicardial access was obtained successfully in 100% of patients in the first attempt. The success rate of the anterior approach was comparable with the reported success rate of the NIN technique (100% vs. 100%, P value not significant) but better than the Sosa technique (100% vs. 94%, P = 0.012). None of the patients in the anterior approach series suffered from significant pericardial bleeding (defined as greater than 80 mL of blood loss), RV puncture/damage, or need for an emergent cardiac surgery. CONCLUSION: An anterior epicardial approach is feasible and appears to have an acceptable safety profile in comparison with other epicardial approaches.
INTRODUCTION: Epicardial ablation is becoming an important part of management in patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT). Posterior epicardial access via the Sosa or needle-in-needle (NIN) approach for epicardial VT ablation is considered to be the method of choice for most electrophysiologists. Anterior epicardial access as an alternative technique has recently been proposed, but there are limited data about its safety, efficacy, and the rate of immediate complications. In this study, we report our experience with anterior epicardial access between 2009 and 2016. METHODS: Between 2009 and June 2016, 100 consecutive patients underwent epicardial VT ablation using an anterior approach. The success rate, epicardial bleeding, and other complications related to the epicardial access in these patients were compared to the previously reported rate of complications in patients whom epicardial access was performed using the NIN or Sosa techniques. RESULTS: Anterior epicardial access was obtained successfully in 100% of patients in the first attempt. The success rate of the anterior approach was comparable with the reported success rate of the NIN technique (100% vs. 100%, P value not significant) but better than the Sosa technique (100% vs. 94%, P = 0.012). None of the patients in the anterior approach series suffered from significant pericardial bleeding (defined as greater than 80 mL of blood loss), RV puncture/damage, or need for an emergent cardiac surgery. CONCLUSION: An anterior epicardial approach is feasible and appears to have an acceptable safety profile in comparison with other epicardial approaches.
Authors: Frédéric Sacher; Kurt Roberts-Thomson; Philippe Maury; Usha Tedrow; Isabelle Nault; Daniel Steven; Meleze Hocini; Bruce Koplan; Lionel Leroux; Nicolas Derval; Jens Seiler; Matthew J Wright; Laurence Epstein; Michel Haissaguerre; Pierre Jais; William G Stevenson Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-05-25 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Luigi Di Biase; Pasquale Santangeli; David J Burkhardt; Rong Bai; Prasant Mohanty; Corrado Carbucicchio; Antonio Dello Russo; Michela Casella; Sanghamitra Mohanty; Agnes Pump; Richard Hongo; Salwa Beheiry; Gemma Pelargonio; Pietro Santarelli; Martina Zucchetti; Rodney Horton; Javier E Sanchez; Claude S Elayi; Dhanunjay Lakkireddy; Claudio Tondo; Andrea Natale Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-07-10 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Robert A Schweikert; Walid I Saliba; Gery Tomassoni; Nassir F Marrouche; Christopher R Cole; Thomas J Dresing; Patrick J Tchou; Dianna Bash; Salwa Beheiry; Cathy Lam; Logan Kanagaratnam; Andrea Natale Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-09-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Muchtiar Khan; Astrid A Hendriks; Sing-Chien Yap; Wouter R Berger; Gijsbert S de Ruiter; Tamas Szili-Torok Journal: HeartRhythm Case Rep Date: 2018-08-14
Authors: Shijie Zhou; Amir AbdelWahab; John L Sapp; Eric Sung; Konstantinos N Aronis; James W Warren; Paul J MacInnis; Rushil Shah; B Milan Horáček; Ronald Berger; Harikrishna Tandri; Natalia A Trayanova; Jonathan Chrispin Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-10-06 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Kobra Haghighi; George Gardner; Elizabeth Vafiadaki; Mohit Kumar; Lisa C Green; Jianyong Ma; Jeffrey S Crocker; Sheryl Koch; Demetrios A Arvanitis; Phillip Bidwell; Jack Rubinstein; Rutger van de Leur; Pieter A Doevendans; Fadi G Akar; Michael Tranter; Hong-Sheng Wang; Sakthivel Sadayappan; Deeptankar DeMazumder; Despina Sanoudou; Roger J Hajjar; Francesca Stillitano; Evangelia G Kranias Journal: J Pers Med Date: 2021-06-03