UNLABELLED: We evaluated the factors affecting epicardial radiofrequency (RF) lesion formation in normal ventricular myocardium. In 16 dogs, a minithoracotomy was made and a sheath was placed in the pericardial space. Standard ablation lesions (4-mm tip catheter; 70 ( composite function) C/60 seconds) were created in each ventricle under fluoroscopy guidance (n = 7) or hand-held with direct visualization of the catheter to assure optimal electrode-tissue contact (n = 6). In the latter, thermally-shielded (TS) electrodes (50% tip surface along its 4 mm length) were used in 3/6 dogs. Catheter tip (4 mm) irrigation (13 mL/minutes; 40 ( composite function) C/60 seconds) was employed with conventional techniques in 3 additional dogs. RESULTS: With optimal electrode-tissue contact (11 lesions), power (3.4 +/- 2.3 W vs. 16 +/- 13 W; p < 0.001) and pacing thresholds (0.2 +/- 0.0 mA vs. 3.6 +/- 5.7 mA; p = 0.004) were lower than standard RF (25 lesions). However, lesion dimensions were similar and transmural lesions did not occur (depth 2.8 +/- 1.1 mm vs. 3.0 +/- 1.5 mm). Catheter irrigation allowed high power outputs (43 +/- 6.1 W; p < 0.001) generating transmural lesions, 5/9 (55%), depth 6.4 +/- 2.1 mm. At constant power (2 W), catheter-tip temperature (52 +/- 5.2( composite function) C vs. 57 +/- 6.6( composite function) C; p = NS) and lesion (10 in each group) dimensions were similar for conventional and TS electrodes, but damage to parietal pericardium and lungs occurred with conventional electrodes only (70% vs. 0% p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Standard epicardial RF ablation does not produce deep lesions and exhibits a significant energy loss probably due to poor electrode-tissue contact. Catheter irrigation allows delivery of high power outputs to the epicardium consistently creating deeper lesions than standard ablation. TS electrodes may reduce damage to neighboring structures during epicardial RF ablation.
UNLABELLED: We evaluated the factors affecting epicardial radiofrequency (RF) lesion formation in normal ventricular myocardium. In 16 dogs, a minithoracotomy was made and a sheath was placed in the pericardial space. Standard ablation lesions (4-mm tip catheter; 70 ( composite function) C/60 seconds) were created in each ventricle under fluoroscopy guidance (n = 7) or hand-held with direct visualization of the catheter to assure optimal electrode-tissue contact (n = 6). In the latter, thermally-shielded (TS) electrodes (50% tip surface along its 4 mm length) were used in 3/6 dogs. Catheter tip (4 mm) irrigation (13 mL/minutes; 40 ( composite function) C/60 seconds) was employed with conventional techniques in 3 additional dogs. RESULTS: With optimal electrode-tissue contact (11 lesions), power (3.4 +/- 2.3 W vs. 16 +/- 13 W; p < 0.001) and pacing thresholds (0.2 +/- 0.0 mA vs. 3.6 +/- 5.7 mA; p = 0.004) were lower than standard RF (25 lesions). However, lesion dimensions were similar and transmural lesions did not occur (depth 2.8 +/- 1.1 mm vs. 3.0 +/- 1.5 mm). Catheter irrigation allowed high power outputs (43 +/- 6.1 W; p < 0.001) generating transmural lesions, 5/9 (55%), depth 6.4 +/- 2.1 mm. At constant power (2 W), catheter-tip temperature (52 +/- 5.2( composite function) C vs. 57 +/- 6.6( composite function) C; p = NS) and lesion (10 in each group) dimensions were similar for conventional and TS electrodes, but damage to parietal pericardium and lungs occurred with conventional electrodes only (70% vs. 0% p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Standard epicardial RF ablation does not produce deep lesions and exhibits a significant energy loss probably due to poor electrode-tissue contact. Catheter irrigation allows delivery of high power outputs to the epicardium consistently creating deeper lesions than standard ablation. TS electrodes may reduce damage to neighboring structures during epicardial RF ablation.
Authors: Uwe Dorwarth; Michael Fiek; Thomas Remp; Cristopher Reithmann; Martin Dugas; Gerhard Steinbeck; Ellen Hoffmann Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: Kyoko Soejima; Gregory Couper; Joshua M Cooper; John L Sapp; Laurence M Epstein; William G Stevenson Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-08-30 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: André d'Avila; Christopher Houghtaling; Paulo Gutierrez; Olivera Vragovic; Jeremy N Ruskin; Mark E Josephson; Vivek Y Reddy Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-04-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: André D'Avila; Paulo Gutierrez; Mauricio Scanavacca; Vivek Reddy; Daniel L Lustgarten; Eduardo Sosa; José Antonio F Ramires Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: H Nakagawa; W S Yamanashi; J V Pitha; M Arruda; X Wang; K Ohtomo; K J Beckman; J H McClelland; R Lazzara; W M Jackman Journal: Circulation Date: 1995-04-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; John L Sapp; Andrew P Selwyn; Gregory Couper; Laurence M Epstein Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-05-19 Impact factor: 24.094