Literature DB >> 12948094

Impact of transabdominal ultrasound guidance on performance and outcome of transcervical uterine embryo transfer.

Sebastian Mirkin1, Estella L Jones, Jacob F Mayer, Laurel Stadtmauer, William E Gibbons, Sergio Oehninger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the impact of transabdominal ultrasound guidance on embryo transfer during IVF therapy.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 823 consecutive embryo transfers. Three hundred and sixty-seven procedures performed with transabdominal ultrasound guidance were compared to 456 cases performed with the "clinical touch" method.
RESULTS: Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer yielded higher, but not statistically significant, clinical pregnancy (48% vs. 44%) and implantation rates (22% vs. 20%). The incidence of multiple pregnancies, ectopic and multiple pregnancy rates were similar. The frequency of negative factors typically associated with difficult transfers, such as requirement of use of tenaculum, and presence of blood or mucus in the catheter tip, were significantly lower in the ultrasound-guided group in comparison with the clinical touch group. Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer was associated with a significantly increased easiness of transfer performance; 95% of the transfers were rated as very easy in the ultrasound-guidance group compared to 87% in the clinical touch group. The use of a soft pass catheter was the only variable independently and significantly associated with pregnancy success (odds ratio = 2.74). CONCLUSION(S): Ultrasound-guidance facilitates embryo transfer and in combination with the use of a soft catheter should be implemented to optimize embryo transfer results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12948094      PMCID: PMC3455275          DOI: 10.1023/a:1024809607966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  25 in total

1.  Embryo transfer under ultrasound guidance improves pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization.

Authors:  B Coroleu; O Carreras; A Veiga; A Martell; F Martinez; I Belil; L Hereter; P N Barri
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 2.  Embryo transfer: techniques and variables affecting success.

Authors:  W B Schoolcraft; E S Surrey; D K Gardner
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  O S Tang; E H Ng; W W So; P C Ho
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer maximizes the IVF results on day 3 and day 4 embryo transfer but has no impact on day 5.

Authors:  Y Prapas; N Prapas; A Hatziparasidou; P Vanderzwalmen; M Nijs; S Prapa; G Vlassis
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 5.  Optimizing the embryo transfer technique.

Authors:  R T Mansour; M A Aboulghar
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Case-control studies: research in reverse.

Authors:  Kenneth F Schulz; David A Grimes
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-02-02       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer improves pregnancy rates and increases the frequency of easy transfers.

Authors:  R Matorras; E Urquijo; R Mendoza; B Corcóstegui; A Expósito; F J Rodríguez-Escudero
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Pregnancy rates after embryo transfer depend on the provider at embryo transfer.

Authors:  R M Hearns-Stokes; B T Miller; L Scott; D Creuss; P K Chakraborty; J H Segars
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Transvaginal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer improves outcome in patients with previous failed in vitro fertilization cycles.

Authors:  Robert E Anderson; Nancy L Nugent; Amanda T Gregg; Susan L Nunn; Barry R Behr
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Ultrasound guidance for human embryo transfer.

Authors:  R C Strickler; C Christianson; J P Crane; A Curato; A B Knight; V Yang
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  7 in total

1.  Cumulative exposure to high estradiol levels during the follicular phase of IVF cycles negatively affects implantation.

Authors:  Murat Arslan; Silvina Bocca; Ebru Ozturk Arslan; Hakan E Duran; Laurel Stadtmauer; Sergio Oehninger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Impact of serum estradiol levels on the implantation rate of cleavage stage cryopreserved-thawed embryos transferred in programmed cycles with exogenous hormonal replacement.

Authors:  Silvina Bocca; Elvira Bondía Real; Susanna Lynch; Laurel Stadtmauer; Hind Beydoun; Jacob Mayer; Sergio Oehninger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Embryo catheter loading and embryo culture techniques: results of a worldwide Web-based survey.

Authors:  Mindy S Christianson; Yulian Zhao; Gon Shoham; Irit Granot; Anat Safran; Ayatallah Khafagy; Milton Leong; Zeev Shoham
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Does the Presence of Blood in the Catheter or the Degree of Difficulty of Embryo Transfer Affect Live Birth?

Authors:  Torie C Plowden; Micah J Hill; Shana M Miles; Benjamin Hoyt; Belinda Yauger; James H Segars; John M Csokmay; Rebecca J Chason
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.060

5.  The effect of embryo catheter loading technique on pregnancy rate.

Authors:  Tamar Matitashvili; Seifeldin Sadek; Gerard Celia
Journal:  Reprod Fertil       Date:  2022-05-03

Review 6.  Evidence and consensus on technical aspects of embryo transfer.

Authors:  Arianna D'Angelo; Costas Panayotidis; Alessandra Alteri; Saria Mcheik; Zdravka Veleva
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2022-09-06

7.  Correlation of Site of Embryo Transfer with IVF Outcome: Analysis of 743 Cycles from a Single Center.

Authors:  Neeta Singh; Kusum Lata; Neena Malhotra; P Vanamail
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.