Literature DB >> 11527896

Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer maximizes the IVF results on day 3 and day 4 embryo transfer but has no impact on day 5.

Y Prapas1, N Prapas, A Hatziparasidou, P Vanderzwalmen, M Nijs, S Prapa, G Vlassis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of ultrasound-guided embryo transfer has been reported to affect success rates in some centres but not others. In a prospective study, we examined the influence of ultrasound guidance in embryo transfer performed on different days after oocyte retrieval.
METHODS: Two different methods of embryo transfer were evaluated in 1069 consecutive transfers. The ultrasound-guided embryo transfer was used in 433 cases, whereas 636 embryo transfers were performed with the tactile assessment ('clinical feel') method.
RESULTS: Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer yielded a higher overall pregnancy rate than the 'clinical feel' approach, 47 versus 36% (P < 0.001). This difference was statistically significant where embryos were transferred after 3 or 4 days of culture, 45.9 versus 37.1% (P = 0.001) and 42.3 versus 27% (P = 0.035) respectively but not significant (P = 0.112) on day 5 embryo transfer (56.3 versus 45.7%). Likewise, the implantation rate was significantly different between the two groups on day 3 and 4 embryo transfer, 23.3 versus 15.8% (P < 0.01) and 21.6 versus 15.7% (P < 0.05%) respectively but no statistical difference was noted on day 5 embryo transfer, 26.7 versus 23.6%.
CONCLUSION: Ultrasound assistance in embryo transfer on day 3 and 4 significantly improved pregnancy rates in IVF but had no impact on day 5.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11527896     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.9.1904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  6 in total

1.  Impact of transabdominal ultrasound guidance on performance and outcome of transcervical uterine embryo transfer.

Authors:  Sebastian Mirkin; Estella L Jones; Jacob F Mayer; Laurel Stadtmauer; William E Gibbons; Sergio Oehninger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Should the flexibility enabled by performing a day-4 embryo transfer remain as a valid option in the IVF laboratory? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Simopoulou; K Sfakianoudis; P Tsioulou; A Rapani; E Maziotis; P Giannelou; S Grigoriadis; A Pantou; K Nikolettos; N Vlahos; K Pantos; M Koutsilieris
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Embryo afterloading: a refinement in embryo transfer technique that may increase clinical pregnancy.

Authors:  Adrienne B Neithardt; James H Segars; Sasha Hennessy; Aidita N James; Jeffrey L McKeeby
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  The impact of the depth of embryo replacement on IVF outcome.

Authors:  Arianna Pacchiarotti; Mohamed A Mohamed; Giulietta Micara; Daniela Tranquilli; Antonella Linari; Salomè M B Espinola; Cesare Aragona
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Ultrasound guidance versus the blind method for intrauterine catheter insemination: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sarah Mubarak; Noor Haliza Yusoff; Tassha Hilda Adnan
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2019-06-01

6.  Uterine factors modify the association between embryo transfer depth and clinical pregnancy.

Authors:  Xiaohua Sun; Jiali Cai; Lanlan Liu; Haixiao Chen; Xiaoming Jiang; Jianzhi Ren
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 4.996

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.