Literature DB >> 12946108

Electrophysiological correlates of anticipatory and poststimulus components of task switching.

Frini Karayanidis1, Max Coltheart, Patricia T Michie, Karen Murphy.   

Abstract

Task-switching paradigms can shed light on cognitive and neural processes underlying attentional control mechanisms. An alternating runs task-switching paradigm (R. D. Rogers & S. Monsell, 1995) is used to identify ERP components associated with anticipatory and poststimulus components of task-switching processes. Subjects alternated between two tasks in a predictable series (AABB). Reaction time (RT) switch cost reduced with increasing response-stimulus (R-S) interval and a residual switch cost remained at the longest R-S interval. A switch-related positivity (D-Pos) developed in the R-S interval. D-Pos was time-locked to response onset, peaked around 400 ms post-response onset, and was unaffected by task-set interference. A switch-related negativity (D-Neg) emerged after stimulus onset. D-Neg peaked earlier with increasing R-S interval and its amplitude and latency were affected by task-set interference. D-Pos and D-Neg were interpreted within current models of task-switching.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12946108     DOI: 10.1111/1469-8986.00037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  60 in total

1.  The bivalency effect in task switching: event-related potentials.

Authors:  John G Grundy; Miriam F F Benarroch; Todd S Woodward; Paul D Metzak; Jennifer C Whitman; Judith M Shedden
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  An ERP study on the processing of common fractions.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Ziqiang Xin; Fuhong Li; Qi Wang; Cody Ding; Hong Li
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  ERP correlates of response inhibition after-effects in the stop signal task.

Authors:  Daniel J Upton; Peter G Enticott; Rodney J Croft; Nicholas R Cooper; Paul B Fitzgerald
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  A critical test of the failure-to-engage theory of task switching.

Authors:  Scott Brown; Curtis Lehmann; Dane Poboka
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-02

5.  Event related brain potential evidence for preserved attentional set switching in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Paul D Kieffaber; Brian F O'Donnell; Anantha Shekhar; William P Hetrick
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  At your own peril: an ERP study of voluntary task set selection processes in the medial frontal cortex.

Authors:  Birte U Forstmann; K Richard Ridderinkhof; Jochen Kaiser; Christoph Bledowski
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Anticipatory reconfiguration elicited by fully and partially informative cues that validly predict a switch in task.

Authors:  Frini Karayanidis; Elise L Mansfield; Kasey L Galloway; Janette L Smith; Alexander Provost; Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Is task switching nothing but cue priming? Evidence from ERPs.

Authors:  Kerstin Jost; Ulrich Mayr; Frank Rösler
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Cross-sectional comparison of executive attention function in normally aging long-term T'ai chi, meditation, and aerobic fitness practitioners versus sedentary adults.

Authors:  Teresa D Hawkes; Wayne Manselle; Marjorie H Woollacott
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 2.579

10.  Characterizing switching and congruency effects in the Implicit Association Test as reactive and proactive cognitive control.

Authors:  Joseph Hilgard; Bruce D Bartholow; Cheryl L Dickter; Hart Blanton
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.