Literature DB >> 12942276

Da Vinci robot assisted Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty: technique and 1 year follow-up.

Wassilios Bentas1, Marc Wolfram, Ronald Bräutigam, Michael Probst, Wolf-Dietrich Beecken, Dietger Jonas, Jochen Binder.   

Abstract

In experienced hands, laparoscopic pyeloplasty is an effective alternative treatment for symptomatic ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). Although laparoscopic surgery can clearly benefit patients, laparoscopic pyeloplasty using conventional instrumentation is complex. The purpose of this report is to evaluate the feasibility of robot assisted laparoscopic surgery. Eleven pyeloplasties for UPJO were performed via a laparoscopic transperitoneal approach exclusively with the da Vinci Surgical System. The mean procedure time was 197 min (range 110-310 min). All operations were completed laparoscopically with no intraoperative complications and negligible blood loss. All patients recovered rapidly after surgery with excellent functional results at the 1 year follow-up. Our initial experience suggests that robot assisted Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty is a safe and effective alternative to conventional laparoscopic surgery. In our opinion, robot assisted surgery will allow urologists to perform complex procedures with greater precision, confidence, and better results, as well as enable them to adapt the whole spectrum of laparoscopic procedures to their field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12942276     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-003-0348-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  17 in total

1.  Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  J Binder; W Kramer
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 2.  Laparoscopic surgery in urology.

Authors:  G Janetschek; M Marberger
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.309

3.  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  G Janetschek; R Peschel; F Frauscher; F Franscher
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.241

4.  Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty performed using the da Vinci robotic system.

Authors:  Matthew T Gettman; Richard Neururer; Georg Bartsch; Reinhard Peschel
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty in children.

Authors:  H L Tan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Manual vs robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of basic manipulation and suturing tasks.

Authors:  A Garcia-Ruiz; M Gagner; J H Miller; C P Steiner; J F Hahn
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1998-09

7.  Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional laparoscopic video systems.

Authors:  E M McDougall; J J Soble; J S Wolf; S Y Nakada; O M Elashry; R V Clayman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: 50 consecutive cases.

Authors:  C G Eden; D Cahill; J D Allen
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Laparoscopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy using a remote-controlled robotic surgical system.

Authors:  Wassilios Bentas; Marc Wolfram; Ronald Bräutigam; Jochen Binder
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Comparison of open and endourologic approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic junction.

Authors:  J D Brooks; L R Kavoussi; G M Preminger; W W Schuessler; R G Moore
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Endopyelotomy in the age of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Daniel Yong; David M Albala
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  [Mechatronic in functional endoscopic sinus surgery. First experiences with the daVinci Telemanipulatory System].

Authors:  G Strauss; D Winkler; S Jacobs; C Trantakis; A Dietz; F Bootz; J Meixensberger; V Falk
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  Robotic surgery: applications, limitations, and impact on surgical education.

Authors:  Bishoy Morris
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2005-09-27

Review 4.  Comparison of surgical approaches to ureteropelvic junction obstruction: endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Robert J Stein; Inderbir S Gill; Mihir M Desai
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Pathophysiology and treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Authors:  Brent Williams; Basir Tareen; Martin I Resnick
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  A prospective comparison of robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Richard E Link; Sam B Bhayani; Louis R Kavoussi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: initial Australasian experience.

Authors:  Rohan Matthew Hall; Declan G Murphy; Ben Challacombe; Anthony J Costello; Jamie Kearsley
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2009-11-27

8. 

Authors:  Jeff Warren; Vitor da Silva; Yves Caumartin; Patrick P W Luke
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Emerging role of robotics in urology.

Authors:  Rajeev Kumar; Ashok K Hemal
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.407

10.  Navigating the difficult robotic assisted pyeloplasty.

Authors:  David D Thiel
Journal:  ISRN Urol       Date:  2012-10-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.