Literature DB >> 12941232

The difference between ISS and NISS in a series of trauma patients in Brazil.

Iveth Y Whitaker1, Terezinha D Gennari, Aristarcho L Whitaker.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT The difference between the ISS and NISS scores was determined for 1,533 inpatients consecutively admitted in 1998 in the Emergency Department of a University Hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. The average ISS was 12.49 +/- 12.72, and the average NISS was 16.99 +/- 17.60. The two predictive scores were identical in 47.75% of the patients and discrepant in 52.25%. In all cases of discrepant scores, the NISS was greater than ISS. NISS identified significantly more (42.47%) major trauma patients (score > or = 16) than ISS (34.18%) (p<0.001). For nonsurvivors the percentage of discrepant score was higher (75.68%) than for the survivors group (48.28%).

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2003        PMID： 12941232      PMCID： PMC3217565     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med        ISSN： 1540-0360


  10 in total

1.  NISS predicts postinjury multiple organ failure better than the ISS.

Authors:  Z Balogh; P J Offner; E E Moore; W L Biffl
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2000-04

2.  Comparing measures of injury severity for use with large databases.

Authors:  Shaun C R Stephenson; John D Langley; Ian D Civil
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2002-08

3.  A comparison of the abilities of nine scoring algorithms in predicting mortality.

Authors:  J Wayne Meredith; Gregory Evans; Patrick D Kilgo; Ellen MacKenzie; Turner Osler; Gerald McGwin; Stephen Cohn; Thomas Esposito; Thomas Gennarelli; Michael Hawkins; Charles Lucas; Charles Mock; Michael Rotondo; Loring Rue; Howard R Champion
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2002-10

4.  A simple mathematical modification of TRISS markedly improves calibration.

Authors:  Turner M Osler; Frederick B Rogers; Gary J Badger; Mark Healey; Dennis W Vane; Steven R Shackford
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2002-10

5.  Measuring injury severity: time for a change?

Authors:  F D Brenneman; B R Boulanger; B A McLellan; D A Redelmeier
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1998-04

6.  The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care.

Authors:  S P Baker; B O'Neill; W Haddon; W B Long
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1974-03

7.  Comparison of alternative methods for assessing injury severity based on anatomic descriptors.

Authors:  W J Sacco; E J MacKenzie; H R Champion; E G Davis; R F Buckman
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1999-09

8.  Limitations of the TRISS method for interhospital comparisons: a multihospital study.

Authors:  C G Cayten; W M Stahl; J G Murphy; N Agarwal; D W Byrne
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1991-04

9.  A modification of the injury severity score that both improves accuracy and simplifies scoring.

Authors:  T Osler; S P Baker; W Long
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1997-12

10.  Injury Severity Score versus New Injury Severity Score for penetrating injuries.

Authors:  Hans Husum; Gino Strada
Journal:  Prehosp Disaster Med       Date:  2002 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.040
  10 in total
  8 in total

1.  New Injury Severity Score is a better predictor of mortality for blunt trauma patients than the Injury Severity Score.

Authors:  Hani O Eid; Fikri M Abu-Zidan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Primary admission and secondary transfer of trauma patients to Dutch level I and level II trauma centers: predictors and outcomes.

Authors:  Claire R L van den Driessche; Charlie A Sewalt; Jan C van Ditshuizen; Lisa Stocker; Michiel H J Verhofstad; Esther M M Van Lieshout; Dennis Den Hartog
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  ISS is not an appropriate tool to estimate overtriage.

Authors:  Paër-Sélim Abback; Kelly Brouns; Jean-Denis Moyer; Mathilde Holleville; Camille Hego; Caroline Jeantrelle; Hélène Bout; Isabelle Rennuit; Arnaud Foucrier; Anaïs Codorniu; Igor Jurcisin; Catherine Paugam-Burtz; Tobias Gauss
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 4.  Comparison of the Ability to Predict Mortality between the Injury Severity Score and the New Injury Severity Score: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Qiangyu Deng; Bihan Tang; Chen Xue; Yuan Liu; Xu Liu; Yipeng Lv; Lulu Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Performance of new adjustments to the TRISS equation model in developed and developing countries.

Authors:  Cristiane de Alencar Domingues; Raul Coimbra; Renato Sérgio Poggetti; Lilia de Souza Nogueira; Regina Marcia Cardoso Sousa
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  A New Injury Severity Score for Predicting the Length of Hospital Stay in Multiple Trauma Patients.

Authors:  Oveis Salehi; Seyed Ashkan Tabibzadeh Dezfuli; Seyed Shojaeddin Namazi; Maryam Dehghan Khalili; Morteza Saeedi
Journal:  Trauma Mon       Date:  2016-02-06

7.  Combining the new injury severity score with an anatomical polytrauma injury variable predicts mortality better than the new injury severity score and the injury severity score: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ting Hway Wong; Gita Krishnaswamy; Nivedita Vikas Nadkarni; Hai V Nguyen; Gek Hsiang Lim; Dianne Carrol Tan Bautista; Ming Terk Chiu; Khuan Yew Chow; Marcus Eng Hock Ong
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Prehospital Intubation and Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury-Assessing Intervention Efficacy in a Modern Trauma Cohort.

Authors:  Rebecka Rubenson Wahlin; David W Nelson; Bo-Michael Bellander; Mikael Svensson; Adel Helmy; Eric Peter Thelin
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 4.003
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.